Authors

Despite the traditional view of scientific discourse as objective and impersonal, contemporary research articles actively employ strategies of authorial presence and reader positioning. One of the key linguistic resources is the first-person plural pronoun we which may refer either to the author(s) of the article (exclusive we, we=the author(s)) or to a wider scientific community (inclusive we, we=author(s)+readers). In this way, we allows writers to regulate their visibility in the text and to establish a relationship with the reader. The article examines the discursive and rhetorical functions of inclusive we in English-language research articles on ecology. The study is based on a corpus of 100 co-authored research articles published in leading ecology journals between 2019 and 2022. Adopting a mixed-methods approach that combines corpus analysis with functional discourse interpretation, the study examines the pronouns we, our and us as functionally equivalent resources. The analysis identifies five functions of inclusive we: establishing shared epistemic ground, indicating gaps and limitations in knowledge, framing future research perspectives, expanding the scope of addressee inclusion, and engaging the reader in the co-construction of scientific reasoning. Thus, inclusive we contributes to modeling collective agency, reduces the distance between authors and readers, modulates authorial responsibility, and presents scientific knowledge as a shared and ongoing process.