Linguopragmatic Potential of the Use of Polycode Metaphor in PR Discourse

Abstract

This study is a continuation of the author’s research of various approaches to the use of metaphor and other expressive language means in texts of English PR discourse (public relations discourse). The aim of the work to reveal the use of the linguistic and pragmatic potential of expressive linguistic units inherent in the texts of the sphere of directed communication, based on the material of the English-language PR discourse, taking into account the PR ends of informing the society and building a certain understanding of the described phenomena. Regarding the stance of attributing metaphor to complex mental mechanisms, public relations councilors resort to their usage to represent new phenomena through the sensory and social experience of a person. The novelty of the study is the conclusion that by using certain polycode language units, PR copywriters get the opportunity to transfer conceptual representations to a process or phenomenon that is difficult to understand, since complex professional texts can be adapted for understanding through similarity and analogy presented in language. The conducted research contributes to discursive studies, as well as to understanding of metaphorical thinking in theory and practice, which can be used in teaching courses in lexicology, phraseology of the English language, as well as for training specialists in the field of communication studies.

References

1. Arutjunova N.D. 1990. Metafora i diskurs In N.D. Arutjunova, M.A. Zhurinskaja (eds.) Teorija metafory: Sbornik: per. s angl., franz., nem., isp., pol’sk. yaz. [Metaphor and discourse / Theory of metaphor: a collection of articles, transl. from Eng, Fr., Ger., Sp., Pol.]. Intro by N.D. Arutjunova. Moscow, Progress. (In Russ.)

2. Vishnyakova O.D. 2003. Funkzional’nye osobennosti yazykovogo znaka v yazyke i rechi [Functional particularities of the language sign in language and in speech]. Moscow, Ref. of Doct. of Philology thesis. (In Russ.)

3. Dorofeyeva A.A. 2014. What is the mystery of metaphor? (On the approaches to the metaphor study among European scientists of the 20th century). Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 4, pp. 155–160. (In Russ.)

4. Zagryazkina T.Yu. 2014. Reference Points of Language and Culture: Statics and Dynamics (as Exemplified by Quebec). Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 2, pp. 61–71. (In Russ.)

5. Kubrjakova E.S., Dem’jankov V.Z., Pankrats Yu. G., Luzina L.G. 1997. Kratkij slovar’ kognitivnykh terminov [A Concise dictionary of cognitive terminology]. Moscow, Philol. faculty Lomonosov Moscow State University. (In Russ.)

6. Lakoff G., Johnson M. 1990. Metaphors we live by In Theory of Metaphor [Teorija metafory]. Moscow. (In Russ.)

7. Minyar-Belorucheva A.P. 2015. Osobennosti funkcionirovanija konceptual’nyh metafor v politicheskom diskurse [Particularities of the functioning of conceptual metaphors in political discourse] In K.R. Galiullina, E.A. Gorobec, G.A. Nikolaeva (eds.) I.A. Bodujen de Kurtenje i mirovaja lingvistika: mezhdunar. konf.: V Bodujenovskie chtenija. V. 2. Kazan’. University. Kazan’, pp. 203–207.

8. Minyar-Beloroucheva A.P., Sergienko P.I. 2022. Studying Linguistic Means of Expression of PR Campaigns Aimed at Combating the Pandemic in the Digital Age: a Multimodal Approach. Nauchny`e issledovaniya i razrabotki. Sovremennaya kommunikativistika [Scientific research and development. Modern communication science], vol. 57, no. 2, рp. 107–114. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/2587-9103-2022-11-2-107-114

9. Molchanova G.G. 2011. Metody issledovanija v mezhkulturnoj kommunikazii: simvol kak kognitivnaja pamjat’ kul’tury [Research methods of intercultural communication: symbol as a cognitive culture memory]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication. no. 1, pp.7–24. (In Russ.)

10. Nevezhina E.A. 2021. The Roestigraben phenomenon in the French-speaking press in Switzerland. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no.3, pp. 41–50. (In Russ.)

11. Raevskaya M.M., Selivanova I.V. 2020. The pragmatic potential of metaphor in public speech (a case study of Juan Carlos I’s Christmas messages. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 4, pp. 52–59. (In Russ.)

12. Sergienko P.I. 2021. Social role of PR through the cognitive metaphor prism in the English professional discourse. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 3, pp. 93–102. (In Russ.)

13. Stepanov Yu.S. 1997. Konstanty: Slovar’ russkoi kul’turi. Opyt issledovaniya [Constants: A dictionary on Russian culture. Research experience]. Moscow, Shkola “Yazyki russkoj kul’tury”, pp. 40–76. (In Russ.)

14. Ter-Minasova S.G. 2017. Challenges of Intercultural Communication: A View from Russia. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 4, pp. 9–19. (In Russ.)

15. Chudinov A.P. 2013. Ocherki po sovremennoj politicheskoj metaforologii [Notes on the modern political metaphor]. Ekaterinburg. (In Russ.)

16. BP Corporate Journal. URL: https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/news-and-insights/bp-magazine/five-emerging-technologies.html (accessed: 19.06.2022).

17. Lakoff G. Johnson M. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chi.

18. Wolstenholme S. (ed.) 2013. Introduction of Public Relations. Pearson. UK.