eLIBRARY ID: 8377
ISSN: 2074-1588

eLIBRARY ID: 8377
ISSN: 2074-1588

En Ru
Changes in the British Pronunciation Norm: From Received Pronunciation (RP) to Standard Southern British (SSB)

Changes in the British Pronunciation Norm: From Received Pronunciation (RP) to Standard Southern British (SSB)

Published: 09/30/2021

Keywords: dictionaries of pronunciation; Received Pronunciation; Standard Southern British; BBC pronunciation; articulation of sounds; pitch-movement

To cite this article

Mindrul O.S. Changes in the British Pronunciation Norm: From Received Pronunciation (RP) to Standard Southern British (SSB). // Moscow University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication 2021. Issue 3.

Issue 3, 2021

Abstract

The article deals with the issue of the British pronunciation norm and the changes in it in the course of the last few decades. Both segmental and suprasegmental features of phonation are considered with the aim of describing the most noticeable phenomena that characterize Standard Southern British as the norm of today and distinguish it from Received Pronunciation as the norm of the past. A comparative study of several pronouncing dictionaries starting from the earliest one published at the end of the 19th century to the latest one has made it possible to verify the changes in the phonemic as well as the phonetic composition of words. A large corpus of authentic recorded speech has been subjected to analysis through the prism of observations made by British phoneticians concerning the recent changes in the articulation of vowels and consonants. A few most obvious changes in the pitch movement of British English have been commented upon as their influence on the Russian language is impossible to ignore. No less important was the issue of the system of terminology used when describing the British pronunciation standard: as it reflects the changing nature of the norm, its overview helped to clarify the nature of the changes themselves.

References

  1. Babushkina E.A. 2012. Prosodija diktorskoj rechi. [Prosodic features of news reading]. Vestnik Burjatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Jazyk. Literatura. Kul’tura, no. 11, pp. 11–15. (In Russ.)

  2. Bubennikova O.A. 2004. Literary Pronunciation Rate (RP) in Britain: History and Development Prospects. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 19, pp. 18–31. (In Russ.)

  3. Demina M.A. 2017. Anglijskie intonacionnye strategii v rechi russkih diktorov novostnyh programm. [English intonation strategies in the speech of Russian news presenters]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki, no. 3, pp. 34–50. (In Russ.)

  4. Nazarova A.D. 2015. Mezhjazykovaja intonacionnaja interferencija i ee rol’ v anglojazychnoj diktorskoj rechi russkih bilingvov [Bilingual intonational interference in English speech of Russian television announcers]. Sovremennye nauchnye issledovanija i innovacii, no. 12. URL: http://web.snauka.ru/issues/2015/12/61480 (accessed: 20.12.2020). (In Russ.)

  5. Shevchenko T.I. 1990. Social’naja differenciacija anglijskogo proiznoshenija [Social differentiation of English pronunciation]. Moscow. (In Russ.)

  6. Shljahova E.S. 2012. Diskussija o prirode orfojepicheskoj normy v Velikobritanii: istorija i sovremennost’ [The debate about the nature of pronunciation norm in Great Britain: history and modern times]. Vestnik MGLU. Jazykoznanie, no. 634, pp. 201–211. (In Russ.)

  7. Engel E.I. 2005. Comparative-diachronic analysis of variative accent models of the British variant of the English language. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 3, pp. 112–117. (In Russ.)

  8. Engel E.I. 2006. Accent variations in diachronical aspect. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 2, pp. 28–34. (In Russ.)

  9. Cruttenden A. 2014. Gimson’s pronunciation of English. 8th ed. Routledge.

  10. Ellis A. 1869. On Early English Pronunciation, with especial reference to Shakspere and Chaucer. V5, Part I, Chapter I. London. Reissued by Greenwood Press, New York, 1968. URL: https://archive.org/details/onearlyenglishp09winkgoog/page/n36/mode/1upakspereAnd/mode/2up (accessed: 10.11.2020).

  11. Gimson A.C. 1962. An Introduction to the pronunciation of English. London.

  12. Honey J. 1989. Does accent matter? London.

  13. International Phonetic Association. 1999. Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge University Press.

  14. Jones D. 1956. Preface to the 11th edition of Everyman’s English Pronouncing Dictionary. New York, E.P. Dutton, p. XV.

  15. Lindsey Geoff. 2019. English after RP. Standard British pronunciation today. Palgrave Macmillan.

  16. Mugglestone L. 2007. “Talking Proper”: The Rise and Fall of the English Accent as Social Symbol. Oxford University Press.

  17. Przedlacka J. 2002. Estuary English? Frankfurt, Peter Lang.

  18. Roach P. 2009. English Phonetics and Phonology. A practical course.4th ed. Cambridge University Press.

  19. Upton C., Kretzschar W.A., Jr., Konopka R. 2001. Oxford Dictionary of Pronunciation for Current English. Introduction. Pronunciation models. Oxford University Press.

  20. Wells J.C. 1986. Acсents of English 2, The British Isles. Cambridge University Press.

  21. Wells J.C. 2006. English Intonation. An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.