On “Kaleidoscopic” Concepts in Linguistics

Abstract

The paper focuses on “kaleidoscopic” concepts, which are defined by A.P. Babushkin as cognitive structures that take different forms under the same verbal “skin”. The core of the research is the question raised by the author about the pos- sibility of “kaleidoscopic” performance being a feature not exclusively found in the concepts “captured” by abstract words. The idea that the concepts verbalized by concrete words can also be “kaleidoscopic” is investigated through a study of the concept TIGER, as actualized in the discourse space of the novel “When You Trap a Tiger” (2020) by Tae Keller, a young Korean-American children’s writer. The author presents a series of examples from the novel showing how cognitive structures of different kinds (e.g. mental pictures, frames, scenarios, schemes) are verbalized by one and the same concrete word, that is the name of the concept TIGER. For each case the type of the “kaleidoscopic” concept is defined, and the cognitive processes (i.e. profiling, conceptual metaphor, perspectivization, symbolization) activating the “shapeshifting” performance of the concept are described. Furthermore, using the data on the nucleus and peripheral areas of the concept in question, as presented in definitions of the key word tiger in several of the most authoritative dictionaries of English, the author formulates the principle of categorization of “kaleidoscopic” concepts that are verbalized by concrete words. It is deemed important that the above-mentioned principle is essentially different from the one pertaining to “kaleidoscopic” concepts named by abstract words.

References

1. Babushkin A.P. 2019. Kategorizatsiia “kaleidoskopicheskikh” kontseptov [Categorization of “Kaleidoscopic” Concepts]. Kognitivnye issledovaniia iazyka: materialy Mezhdunarodnogo kongressa po kognitivnoi lingvistike, 16–18 maia 2019 g. Moscow; Nizhnii Novgorod, 37, pp. 16–18. (In Russ.)

2. Boldyrev N.N. 2016. Tipologiia kontseptov i iazykovaia interpretatsiia [The typology of concepts and linguistic interpretation]. Novaia Rossiia: traditsii i innovatsii v iazyke i nauke o iazyke: materialy dokladov i soobshchenii Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii, posviashchennoi iubileiu Zasluzhennogo deiatelia nauki RF, doktora filologicheskikh nauk, professora L.G. Babenko, 28–30 sent. 2016 g., Ekaterinburg, Rossiia, Moscow; Ekaterinburg, Kabinetnyi uchenyi, pp. 16–25. (In Russ.)

3. Lakoff G., Johnson M. 2004. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem [Metaphors We Live By]. Moscow, Editorial URSS. (In Russ.)

4. Molchanova G.G. 2018a. Kognitivnyi dissonans kak transaktsionnyi priem postroeniya urbanonima [Cognitive dissonance as a transactional mechanism of the urbanonimic formation]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 1, pp. 8–16. (In Russ.)

5. Molchanova G.G. 2018b. Kognitivnaya sinesteziinaya metafora i teoriya napryazhennosti [Cognitive Cognitive synesthetic metaphor and the theory of tension]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 4, pp. 9–20. (In Russ.)

6. Robustova V.V. 2015. Onomasticheskaya leksika kak sposob verbalizatsii kontseptov [Onomastic lexis as a way of verbalization of concepts]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 2, pp. 20–30. (In Russ.)

7. Jaynes J. 2000. The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind. Boston; New York, Mariner Books, 2000.