Sociocultural Space of “The Forsyte Saga” By John Galsworthy (Culturological Аnalysis)

Abstract

This article attempts to examine the sociocultural space of the United Kingdom, along with its peculiarities based on “The Forsyte Saga” by John Galsworthy. Today, the notion of such a sociocultural space still provokes heated debate among scholars. This paper is an attempt to define the main characteristics of this during one particular period. The sociocultural space of the UK in the late 19th and early 20th centuries was in a state of flux, where the norms and values of two epochs were in bitter conflict. The main focus of the novel is on the representatives of the elite. The author masterfully depicts the ideals, norms and values that formed the basis of upper-class English life during this time. The Forsytes were a highly conservative family, whose outlook was based on cold calculations and a hunger for profit. By contrast, intellectuals and artists of the time saw this world differently. They valued love, family, and sincerity over cash. These contradictory mindsets form the core of a sharp conflict that completely reshaped the sociocultural space of the United Kingdom (particularly England). The ideals and values of a world of feelings and emotions prevailed over the norms and principles of a more materialistic world, and determined the many peculiarities of the sociocultural space of the new era.

References

1. Agapova V.N. 2016. K voprosu o kul’turnykh tsennostyakh i sposobakh ikh peredachi [Revisiting cultural values and the means of its reproduction]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 4, pp. 107–113. (In Russ.)

2. Giddens A. 2005. Sotsiologiya [Sociology]. Moscow, Editorial URSS. (In Russ.)

3. Orlova E.V. 2017. Sotsiokulturnoe prostranstvo: k opredeleniyu ponyatiya [Sociocultural space definition of the notion]. Manuscript, no. 7 (81), pp. 149–152. (In Russ.) URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsiokulturnoe-prostranstvo-k-opredeleniyu-ponyatiya (accessed: 06.07.2021). (In Russ.)

4. Pavlovskii I.V. 2014. Sotsiokul’turnoe regionovedenie kak gumanitarnaya spetsial’nost’ [Sociocultural Regional Studies as a Special Field in Humanities]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 3, pp. 67–76. (In Russ.)

5. Remizova N.M. Interpretatsiya ponyatiya “sotsiokul’turnoe prostranstvo”v klassicheskoi sotsiologii [Interpretation of notion “socio-cultural space” in classical sociology]. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, no. 10 (24), pp. 158–162. (In Russ.)

6. Sorokin P.A. 1992. Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiya. Obshchestvo [Man. Civilization. Society]. Moscow, Politizdat. URL: https://sociology.knu.ua/sites/default/files/library/elclosed/sorokin.pdf (accessed: 13.02.2021). (In Russ.)

7. Florenskii P.A. 2000. Stat’i i issledovaniya po istorii i filosofii iskusstva i arkheologii [Articles and research on the history and philosophy of art and archeology]. Moscow, Mysl’, pp. 446. (In Russ.)

8. Shakirova E.Yu. 2014. Sotsiokul’turnoe prostranstvo: osnovaniya ontologicheskogo analiza [Social and cultural field: the roots of ontological analysis]. Vestnik of Samara State University, no. 1 (112), pp. 15–19. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsiokulturnoe-prostranstvo-osnovaniya-ontologicheskogo-analiza (accessed: 24.04.2021). (In Russ.)