French mid vowels: trends in modern pronunciation with didactic commentary

Abstract

Mid vowels are presented by two series of sounds: mid-high vowels /e/ ~ /ø/ ~ /o/ and mid-low /ɛ/ ~ /œ/ ~ /ɔ/ vowels. Compared to other vowels in French, they are characterized by significant variability, which is explained by several factors. One of them is the so called “oi de position” or closed/open syllable adjustment. This means that mid-high vowels are pronounced mainly in an open syllable, while mid-low vowels are pronounced in a closed one. Despite the existing phonological limitations, the realization of the law of position in the stressed syllable is becoming increasingly widespread in modern usage. This trend gives reason to consider the phonemes composing the oppositions /е/ ~ /ɛ/, /ø/ ~ /œ/, /о/ ~ /ɔ/ as positional variants of three phonemes /E/, /Ø/, /O/. Another important factor of the mid vowels vari- ability is distant regressive assimilation or vowel harmonization, which consists in the fact that the vowel of the stressed syllable affects the realization of the mid vowel in the preceding syllable. Until now, it was believed that assimilation affected the tongue height (first formant) of an unstressed vowel. In other words, high stressed vowels tend to increase the height of unstressed mid-low vowels, whereas low stressed vowels tend to low mid-high vowels. Therefore, in an unstressed position, as a rule, the sound of the middle timbre is pronounced [E], [Ø], [O]. The article discusses new data obtained in the corpus studies of this phenomenon in the last decade. Those data let us formulate methodological recommendations for teaching theoretical and practical phonetics of the French language.

References

1.  Bubnova G.I. 2011. Fonetika franczuzskogo yazy`ka. Spravochnik [Phonetics of the French language. Reference book]. Saint-Petersbourg, Lumière. (In Russ.)

2. Bubnova G.I., Tarassova A.N. 2015. Prakticheskaya fonetika franczuzskogo yazy`ka s e`lementami grammatiki [Practical phonetics of the French language with grammar elements]. Moscow, Yurayt Publishing House. (In Russ.)

3. Armstrong N., Low J. 2008. ‘C’est encœure plus jeuli, le Mareuc: some evidence for the spread of /ɔ/-fronting in French’. Transactions of the Philological Society, no. 106(3), pp. 432– 455. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2008.00206.x (accessed: 28.09.2021).

4. Carton F. 1997. Introduction à la phonétique du français [Introduction to the pho- netics of French]. Paris, Dunod, p. 250. (In Russ.)

5.  Desgranges J.C. 1821. Petit dictionnaire du peuple à l’usage des quatre cinquièmes de la France [Small dictionary of the people for the use of four-fifths of France]. Houilles (France), Éditions Manucius, p. 160. [quoted from Walter, 1976: 270]. (In French.)

6. Dell F. 1973. Les règles et les sons. Introduction à la phonologie générative [Rules and sounds. Introduction to generative phonology]. Paris, Hermann, p. 282. (In French.)

7. Delattre P. 1953. Les modes phonétiques du français. The French Review, vol. 27, no. 1, рр. 59–63. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/382418 (accessed: 28.09.2021). (In French.)

8. Delattre P. 1965. Comparing the Phonetic Features of English, French, German and Spanish: An Interim Report. Julius Groos Verlag, p. 120.

9. Fagyal Z., Nguyen N., Boula de Mareüil P. 2003. From dilation to coarticulation: is there vowel harmony in French? Studies in Linguistic Sciences, no. 32, рр. 1–21. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/32227034_From_dilation_to_coarticulation_is_there_vowel_harmony_in_French (accessed: 28.09.2021).

10. Fónagy I. 1989. Le français change de visage? [French changes face?] Revue romane, no. 24 -2, pp. 225-254. URL: https://tidsskrift.dk/revue_romane/article/ view/29677/26966 (accessed: 28.09.2021). (In French.)

11. Gadet F. 1997. Le français ordinaire [Ordinary French]. 2^ème édition. Patis, Armand Colin, p. 153.

12. Gendrot С., Audibert N. 2019. La distinction /e/ vs /ɛ/ en français standard est-elle maintenue en finale de mot ? Étude sur des corpus de parole journalistique et de parole spontanée [Is the distinction /e/ vs /ɛ/ in standard French maintained in word finals? Study on corpora of journalistic and spontaneous speech]. Langue française, no. 3 (203), pp. 53–66. URL: https://www.cairn.info/article.php?ID_ARTICLE=LF_203_0053&contenu=article (accessed: 28.09.2021). (In French.)

13. Grammont M. 1966. Traité Pratique De Prononciation Française [Treatise French Pronunciation Practice]. Paris, Delagrave, p. 231. (In French.)

14. Léon P.R. 1978. Prononciation du français standard. Aide-mémoire d’orthoépie. [Pronunciation of standard French. Orthoepia checklist]. Paris, Didier, p. 186. (In French.)

15. Léon P.R. 1992. Phonétisme et prononciations du français [Phonetism and pronun- ciations of French]. Paris, Nathan, p. 192. (In French.)

16. Lyche C. 2010. Le français de référence: éléments de synthèse [Reference French: elements of synthesis]. In S.Detey, J.Durand, B.Lacs, C.Lyche (éds.). Les variétés du français parlé dans l’espace francophone. Ressource pour l’enseignement. Paris, Ophrys, рp. 142–165. (In French.)

17. Malderez I. 1994. Vers la perte de l’opposition du lieu d’articulation des voyelles moyennes arrondies dans la parole des jeunes gens d’Île-de-France [Towards the loss of the opposition of the place of articulation of the rounded middle vowels in the speech of the young people of Île-de-France]. Trégastel, JEP, pp. 361–366. (In French.)

18. Martinet A. 1969. «C’est jeuli le Mareuc» [«It’s jeuli le Mareuc»]. In Le Français sans fard. Paris, Armand Colin, рp. 191-219. (In French.)

19. Matte E.J. 1982. Histoire des Modes phonétiques du Français [History of the pho- netic Modes of French]. Genève, Librairie DROZ, р. 237. (In French.)

20. Мertens P. 2019. Les alternances des voyelles moyennes [Alternations of middle vowels]. In P. Mertens. Phonétique, phonologie et prosodie du français. Leuven, Belgium. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336798846_Les_ alternances_des_voyelles_moyennes (accessed: 28.09.2021). (In French.)

21.  Mooney D. 2016. ‘C’est jeuli, la Gascœugne!’ L’antériorisation du phonème /ɔ/ dans le français régional du Béarn [It’s jeuli, la Gascœugne!’ The anteriorization of the phoneme in the regional French of Béarn]. French Studies, no. 70 (1), pp. 61-81. URL: https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/48026368/FS_Article_ Revision2.pdf (accessed: 28.09.2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/fs/knv228 (In French.)

22. Nguyen N., Fagyal S. 2008. Acoustic aspects of vowel harmony in French. Journal of Phonetics, no. 36 (1). DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2007.07.001. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/32229733_Acoustic_aspects_of_vowel_harmony_in_ French (accessed: 28.09.2021).

23. St-Gelais X. 2019. L’antériorisation de /ɔ/ en français contemporain: une étude acoustique comparative entre Québec et France. Mémoire [The anteriorization of /ɔ/ in contemporary French: a comparative acoustic study between Quebec and France. Memory]. Québec, Université Laval, p. 264. URL: https://constellation.uqac.ca/5087/1/StGelais_uqac_0862N_10001.pdf (accessed: 28.09.2021). (In French.)

24. Tranel B. 1987. The Sounds of French: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, p. 232 URL: https://www.amazon.com/Sounds-French-Introduction-Bernard-1987-12-25/dp/B01N6L1O8Q (accessed: 28.09.2021).

25. Turco G., Fougeron C., Audibert N. 2016. Que nous apprennent les gros corpus sur l’harmonie vocalique en français ? [What do the large corpora on vocal harmony in French teach us?]. Conference: 31ème Journées d’Etudes sur la Parole (JEP). Paris. URL: https://aclanthology.org/2016.jeptalnrecital-jep.64.pdf (accessed: 28.09.2021). (In French.)

26. Walter H. 1976. La dynamique des phonèmes dans le lexique français comtemporain [The dynamics of phonemes in the French lexicon comtemporain]. Paris, France Expansion, p. 481. (In French.)

27. Walter H. 1977. La phonologie du français [The phonology of French]. Paris, PUF, p. 163. (In French.)