Language norms in the digital age

Abstract

The article is devoted to the current problems of changing language norms under the influence of information and communication technologies. Some theoretical provisions on the specifics of linguistic norms in functional (i.e. norms widely used in speech) and codification aspects (i.e. norms fixed in normative legal acts, dictionaries, reference books, textbooks and grammars) are considered. Some distinctive parameters of the linguistic norms are described as a heterogeneous category characterized, on the one hand, by conservatism, stability, commitment, exemplary, directive and other constant features, on the other hand, by dynamism, instability and variability. The last ones often lead to linguistic deviations. Transformations of linguistic norms in the Internet give an impetus to the emergence of new concepts and the formation of new terms such as “Russian digital literary language” (A.V. Kozulyaev), “criticism of the Internet language” (K. Durscheid), “grammar nazi” and others. The article contains some examples of violations and changes of the norms of the Russian and German languages in the electronic communication. Two areas of criticism of the Internet language are considered: writing (or written texts) and communicative behavior in the Web. Deviations of linguistic norms at different levels (graphic, spelling, lexical, syntactic) in Russian-language online communication are revealed. There are also some prospects for research in this area.

References

1. Bogdanova L.I. 2011. Stilistika russkogo yazyka i kul’tura rechi: Leksikologiya dlya rechevyh dejstvij [Stylistics of the Russian language and culture of speech: Lexicology for speech actions]. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka. (In Russ.)

2. Verbickaya L.A. 2011. Rol’ yazykovoj normy v praktike obucheniya russkomu yazyku [The role of language norms in Russian teaching]. Rhema, no. 1, pp. 47–53. (In Russ.)

3. Germanova N.N. 2011. Teoriya i istoriya literaturnogo yazyka v otechestvennom i angloyazychnom yazykoznanii [Theory and history of the literary language in Russian and English linguistics]. Moscow: Librokom. (In Russ.).

4. Galynskaya Yu.S., Zvyagintsev V.V., Korosteleva N.A. 2021. Upravlencheskij aspekt soblyudeniya delovogo etiketa v obrazovatel’nom prostranstve [Management aspect of compliance with business etiquette in the educational space]. Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogics, no. 5, pp. 32–40. (In Russ.)

5. Gorbachevich K.S. 2009. Variantnost’ slova i yazykovaya norma: na materiale sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [Word variation and language norm. On the material of the modern Russian language], ed. by F.P. Filin. 2nd ed. Moscow: Librokom Publ. (In Russ.)

6. Edlichko A.I. 2020. Orfoepicheskie normy nemeckogo yazyka: problem sistematizacii i kodifi kacii [Orthoepic Norms of the German Language: some Problems of Systematization and Codifi cation]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 2, pp. 27–37. (In Russ.)

7. Edlichko A.I. 2022. Leksikografi cheskaya kodifi kaciya proiznositel’nyh norm nemeckogo yazyka: istoriya i sovremennost’ [Codifi cation of the orthoepic norms of the German language: history and current situation]. In Chernigovskaya T.V. (ed.) XLIX mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya fi lologicheskaya konferenciya, posvyashchennaya pamyati Lyudmily Alekseevny Verbickoj (1936–2019). Izbrannye doklady. Saint-Peterburg: Saint-Petersburg University Publ., pp. 118–136. (In Russ.)

8. Kozulyaev A.V. 2024. Russkij cifrovoj literaturnyj yazyk: k postanovke voprosa [Russian Digital literary language: towards a question]. In Drozdova O.E., Sergeev V.S. (eds.) Metapredmetnyj podhod v obrazovanii: russkij yazyk v shkol’nom I vuzovskom obuchenii raznym predmetam. Russkij yazyk kak sredstvo pedagogicheskogo vozdejstviya i vzaimodejstviya v shkole i vuze. Moscow: MPGU, pp. 37–48. (In Russ.)

9. Kostomarov V.G. 1968. Problemy kul’tury rechi [The problems of speech culture]. In Filin F.P. etc. (eds.) Teoreticheskie problemy sovetskogo yazykoznaniya. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 126–142. (In Russ.)

10. Krongauz M.A. 2013. Samouchitel’ olbanskogo [The Olbanski Tutorial]. Moscow: AST: CORPUS. (In Russ.)

11. Miloslavskij I.G. 2013. Kodifikaciya soderzhatel’noj storony yazykovogo znaka [Codification of the Content of a Language Sign]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 2, pp. 27–37. (In Russ.)

12. Shaibakova D, Protassova E., Yelenevskay M. 2023. Lingvisticheskij plyuricentrizm i russkij yazyk [Linguistic pluricentrism and the Russian language]. Russian Journal of Linguistics, no. 27 (3), pp. 663–686. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-35316. (In Russ.)

13. Bahlo N., Becker T., Steckbauer D. 2016. Von „Klugschei.ern“ und „Grammatik-Nazis“ — Grammatische Normierung im Internet. In Spiegel C., Gysin D. (Hg.) (ed.) Jugendsprache in Schule, Medien und Alltag. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang, pp. 275–286. (In Germ.)

14. Crystal D. 2001. Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

15. Durscheid Ch. 2020. Internet-Sprachkritik. In Niehr, T., Kilian, J., Schiewe, J. (eds.) Handbuch Sprachkritik. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, pp. 326–332. (In Germ.)

16. Storrer A. 2014. Sprachverfall durch internetbasierte Kommunikation? Linguistische Erklarungsansatze — empirische Befunde. In Plewina A., Witt A. (Hgg.): Sprachverfall? Dynamik — Wandel — Variation. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, pp. 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110343007.171 (In Germ.)