eLIBRARY ID: 8377
ISSN: 2074-1588
Recieved: 05/16/2023
Accepted: 07/24/2023
Published: 12/31/2023
Keywords: historical discourse; semiotic system; verbal channel; visual component
DOI Number: 10.55959/MSU-2074-1588-19-26-4-3
Minyar-Beloroucheva A.P. Polycode Historical Discourse Features. // Moscow University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication 2023. Issue 4. 38-49 https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU-2074-1588-19-26-4-3.

The paper deals with the feature of verbal and visual semiotic systems peculiar to historical discourse. The relevance of the research is determined by the necessity to identify the correlation of verbal and visual means used by historians in the transmission of information. The methodology of the article is based on the research works of home and foreign scholars. The methods that have been used in the research are: the method of discursive analysis, the method of linguistic analysis, the method of interpretive analysis. As a result of the analysis of historical discourse it has been established that the appeal to various semiotic systems facilitates and streamlines the assimilation of information about the events of the historical past of mankind, preserving the memory of them in the images proposed by the historians. History, which is not given to historians in their immediate experience, is reconstructed by them by means of different semiotic systems. The verbal code reinforced by the visual one sets a certain perception of historical events as they are viewed by historians. In historical discourse, the use of different semiotic systems in the transmission of the most significant historical events is necessary to attract the attention of recipients to them in order to change not only their perception, but also to transform the basic dominants of their mental space, in which the events of the historical past that are not reproduced in experience are reconstructed.
Alefirenko N.F. 2007. Rechevoj zhanr, diskurs i kul`tura [Speech genre, discourse and culture]. Zhanry` rechi, no. 5, p. 40. (In Russ.)
Apresyan Yu.D. 1995. Obraz cheloveka po danny`m yazy`ka: popy`tka sistemnogo opisaniya [The image of a person according to language data: an attempt at a system description]. Voprosy` yazy`koznaniya, Tambov, no. 1, p. 40. (In Russ.)
Boldyrev N.N. 2004. Konceptual`noe prostranstvo kognitivnoj lingvistiki [Conceptual space of cognitive linguistics]. Voprosy` kognitivnoj lingvistiki, no. 1, p. 18. (In Russ.)
Vinogradov S.I. 1996. Normativny` j i kommunikativno-pragmaticheskij aspekty` kul`tury` rechi [Normative and communicative-pragmatic aspects of speech culture]. Kul`tura russkoj rechi i e`ffektivnost` obshheniya. Moscow Nauka, p. 139. (In Russ.)
Galperin I.R. 2007.Tekst kak obekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya [Text as an object of linguistic research]. Moscow, KomKniga, p. 18. (In Russ.)
Gurevich, A.Ya. 1984. Kategorii sredneveokovoj kultury [Categories of Medieval Culture]. Moscow, Iskusstvo, p. 116. (In Russ.)
Derrida J. 1995. Struktura, znak i igra v diskurse gumanitarny`x nauk [Structure, sign and play in the Discourse of the Humanities]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 9. Philology, no. 5, p. 50. (In Russ.)
Zagryazkina T.Yu. 2022. Faktory` “gibridnost`” i “granicza” v konteste yazy`kovogo obrazovaniya i funkcional`nogo polilingvizma [Factor “hybriditi” and “boeder” in the context of language education and functional multilingualism]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 3, p. 63. (In Russ.)
Karaulov Yu.N., Petrov V.V. 2000. Ot grammatiki teksta k kognitivnoj teorii diskursa [From text grammar to cognitive discourse theory]. Dijk, T.A. van. Yazy`k. Poznanie. Kommunikaciya. Blagoveshhensk, RIO BGK, p. 8. (In Russ.)
Kubryakova E.S. 2004. Yazy`k i znanie: Na puti polucheniya znanij o yazy`ke: Chasti rechi s kognitivnoj tochki zreniya. Rol` yazy`ka v poznanii mira [Language and knowledge: On the way to gaining knowledge about language: Parts of Speech from a cognitive point of view. The role of language in the knowledge of the world]. Moscow, Yazy`ki slavyanskoj kultury, p. 406. (In Russ.)
Levitsky A.E. 2023. Vremya i kultura kak faktory transformacii informacii [Time and culture as factors of information transformation]. Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka, no. 2 (53), p. 445. (In Russ.)
Magirovskaya O.V. 2009. Reprezentaciya subekta poznaniya v yazyke [Representation of the subject of cognition in language]. Avtoref. dis. d-ra filol. nauk. M. (In Russ.)
Molchanova G.G. 2021. Generacionnaya polikodovost` kommunikativny`x modusov. Kakoj on, chelovek novogo pokoleniya? [Generational Polycodness of Communicative Modality. Who is a new generation person?] Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 19: Linguistics and Cross-cultural Communication, no. 2, pp. 9–16. (In Russ.)
Minyar-Beloroucheva A.P. 2020. Rol nacionalnoj kulturnoj kartiny mira v izuchenii inostrannyx yazykov [The role of the national cultural worldview in modern language learning]. Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 19: Linguistics and Crosscultural Communication, no. 2, pp. 182–191. (In Russ.)
Minyar-Beloroucheva A.P., Sergienko P.I. 2022. Multimodalny podxod k rassmotreniyu lingvisticheskix sredstv vyrazheniya PR-kampany, napravlennyx na borbu s pandemiej [Studying Linguistic Means of Expression of PR Campaigns Aimed at Combating the Pandemic in the Digital Age: A Multimodal Approach]. Nauchny`e issledovaniya i razrabotki. Sovremennaya kommunikativistika, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 107–114. DOI: 10.12737/2587-9103-2022-11-2-107-114. (In Russ.)
Nekrasova E.D. 2014. K voprosu o vospriyatii polimodal`ny`x tekstov [On the perception of polymodal texts]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 378, p. 45. (In Russ.)
Omelyanenko V.A., Remchukova E.N. 2018. Polikodovy`e teksty` v aspekte teorii mul`timodal`nosti [Polycode texts in the aspect of multimodality theory]. Kommunikativnye issledovaniya, no. 3 (17), p. 67. DOI: 10.25513/2413-6182.2018.3.66-78. (In Russ.)
Foucault M. 1996. Arxeologiya znaniya [The Archaeology of Knowledge]. Kiev, Nika-Centr.
Cline E. 2015. 1177 BC: The Year Civilazation Collapsed. Prinston: Prinston University Press, p. 48.
Dijk T.A. van. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London, Sage, p.12.
Green J.R. 1911. A Short History of the English People. London, MacMillan and Co., p. xxxiv–xlvii.
Lemke J.L. 2002. Multimedia Genres for Science Education and Scientific Literacy. Developing Advanced Literacy in First and Second Languages / Ed. by M.J. Schleppegrell, M.C. Colombi. URL: http://www.jaylemke.com/storage/Multime-diaGenres-Science-2002.pdf (дата обращения: 17.04.2023).
McKay J.P., Hill B.D., Buckler J. 1991. A History of Western Society. Fourth edition. Vol B: From the Renaissance to 1815. Boston, Houghton Mifflin Company, pp. 516-517.
Morton A. 1984. A Peoples History of England. London: Lawrence & Wishart, p 65.
Sauerbier S.D. 1978. Worter bildlich/Bilder wortlich. Schrift und Bild als Text: Probleme der Wort / Bild Korrelation. Die Einheit der semiotischen Dimensionen. Tubingen.