The Heuristic Potential of Nomadic Notions

Abstract

The interaction of different fields of knowledge leads to the transfer of concepts. The new metalanguage often borrows terminology from areas traditionally considered contiguous, the enrichment of terminological units is due to cross-disciplinary invariants. The article touches upon the problem related to the cognitive potential of nomadic concepts. The purpose of the article is to study the heuristic potential of the interdisciplinary term platform. The objective of the article: to consider the cognitive features of the term platform in the communicative environment. The object of the research is platforms in the information network as a place for communication of scientific, social, financial and economic communities. The research material was: 1) comparison of the definition of the platform as a term in Russian and French dictionaries; 2) study of the meaning and heuristic potential of this nomadic concept and the concept in communication networks. As a result of the conducted research, the communicative significance of the nomadic term platform, formed as a result of the conceptualization of complex logical connections, has been revealed.

References

1. Dem’yankov V.Z. 2016. Yazykovye tekhniki «transfera znanij» [Language techniques of “knowledge transfer”] In Feshchenko V.V. (ed.) Lingvistika i semiotika kul’turnykh transferov: metody, principy, tekhnologii [Linguistics and semiotics of cultural transfers: methods, principles, technologies]. Moscow, Kul’turnaya revolyuciya. (In Russ.)

2. Zykova I.V. 2017. Metayazyk lingvokul’tuologiI: KONSTANTY i VARIANTY. [Metalanguage of Linguoculturology: CONSTANTS and VARIANTS]. Moscow, Gnozis. (In Russ.)

3. Makafi E., Bryun’olfson E. 2019. Mashina. Platforma. Tolpa. Nashe cifrovoe budushchee [Machine, Platform, Crowd. Harnessing Our digital future]. Moscow, Mann, Ivanov, Ferber (MIF). (In Russ.)

4. Nazarenko A.L. 2010. K voprosu ob informatizatsii lingvisticheskogo obrazovaniya [To the issue of informatization of linguistic education]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 1, pp. 114–121. (In Russ.)

5. Le Petit LAROUSSE illustré. 2007. Paris, LAROUSSE.

6. Safonova V.V., Rossinskaya A.N. 2008. Kommunikativno-rechevaya, kul’turovedcheskaya i kognitivnaya napravlennost’ protsessa standartizatsii yazykovogo obrazovaniya v Rossii, SShA i Kanade [Communicative-speech, cultural and cognitive orientation of the process of standardization of language education in Russia, the USA and Canada]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 2, pp. 137–156. (In Russ.)

7. Srnichek N. 2019. Kapitalizm platform [Platform Capitalism]. Moscow, Izd. Dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki. (In Russ.)

8. Taler R. 2014. Ot Homo Economicus k Homo Sapiens [From Homo Economicus to Homo Sapiens]. Logos, no. 1(97), pp. 141–154. (In Russ.)

9. Titova S.V. 2010. Vidy elektronnoi svyazi i ikh didakticheskie vozmozhnosti [Types of electronic communications and their didactic opportunities]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 3, pp. 37–51. (In Russ.)

10. Cherifa B.-Z. 2015. Nouveaux intermédiaires de l’information, nouvelles logiques de captation de la valeur. I2D-Information, données & documents, no. 4 (53), pp. 34–35. URL: https://www.cairn.info/revue-i2d-information-donnees-et-documents-2015-4-page-34.htm (accessed: 07.10.2019).

11. Lambrecht M. 2016. L’économie des plateformes collaboratives. Courrier hebdomadaire du CRISP, no. 26–27 (2311–2312), pp. 5–80. URL: https://www.cairn.info/revue-courrier-hebdomadaire-du-crisp-2016-26-page-5.htm (accessed: 07.10.2019).

12. Moreau F., Nicolas Y. 2018. Financement participative: une voie d’avenir pour la culture. Paris, Presses de Sciences Po.