eLIBRARY ID: 8377
ISSN: 2074-1588

eLIBRARY ID: 8377
ISSN: 2074-1588

En Ru
From “Hagiography” to “Icon”: Written Sources of Stalin’s Imagery

From “Hagiography” to “Icon”: Written Sources of Stalin’s Imagery

Published: 03/31/2020

Keywords: biography; hagiography; iconography; Stalin; Stalin’s imagery; socialist realism; sacralization

To cite this article

Rutsinskaya I.I. From “Hagiography” to “Icon”: Written Sources of Stalin’s Imagery. // Moscow University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication 2020. Issue 1. 70-80

Issue 1, 2020

Abstract

Not a single work of art of 1930–1950s dedicated to the events of Stalin’s life could appear as a result of artist’s personal intention. The imagery of Stalin existed only as a form of interpretation and illustration of the canonical text – the biography of the leader, verified and approved by Stalin himself. In this regard, it seems almost unbelievable that this text in its “classic” form was shaped only by 1939.

This article explores the obstacles that stood in the way of creating the main biographical narrative of the epoch, its proximity to the traditional genre of hagiography, as well as those relations between the text and the image that have developed under the conditions of sacralization of the leader’s power and the formation of a special “religion-like” public consciousness.

Soviet creators of Stalin’s imagery acted as heirs to two traditions at once. On the one hand, adherence to the precepts of Russian realistic painting of the 19th century was proclaimed, which was understood as a return to mimesis, to artistic embodiment of life in the forms of life itself. On the other hand, icon-painting methods of working on the Stalin’s image and an attitude to the text of his biography as to hagiography, requiring unconditional faith and not allowing deviations and distortions were revived.

As a result, this demonstrated unique examples of art, realistic in form and sacred in content.

References

  1. Branderberger D. 2017. Krizis stalinskogo agitpropa: propaganda, politprosveshchenie i terror v SSSR, 1927–1941. [The crisis of the Stalinist agitprop: propaganda, political education and terror in the USSR, 1927–1941] Moscow, Politicheskaya ehntsiklopediya. (In Russ.)

  2. Glotov A.L. 1995. Russkaya literatura XX veka v kontekste kul’tovogo soznaniya [Russian literature of the twentieth century in the context of cult consciousness]. Zelena Gura. (In Russ.)

  3. Golomshtok I. 2012. Yazyk iskusstva pri totalitarizme. [The language of art under totalitarianism] Kontinent, no. 151, pp. 590–623. (In Russ.)

  4. Gyunter KH. 2000. Sotsrealizm i utopicheskoe myshlenie [Socialist Realism and Utopian Thinking]. Sotsrealisticheskii kanon. Sbornik Statei. St. Petersburg, Akademicheskii proekt, pp. 41–49. (In Russ.)

  5. Dobrenko E. 1993. Metafora vlasti: Literatura stalinskoi ehpokhi v istoricheskom osveshchenii. [Metaphor of power: Literature of the Stalin era in historical coverage] Munchen: Verlag Otta Sagner. (In Russ.)

  6. Erokhina A.B. 2017. Kommunikativnaya strategiya interpretatsii v kriticheskom iskusstvovedcheskom diskurse [Communicative strategy of interpretation in art criticism discourse]. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 4, pp. 72–78. (In Russ.)

  7. Esaulov I. 1992. Totalitarnost’ i sobornost’: dva lika russkoi kul’tury [Totalitarianism and collegiality: two faces of Russian culture]. Voprosy literatury. Vyp.1, pp. 148–170. (In Russ.)

  8. Zhivov V.M. 1994. Svyatost’. Kratkii slovar’ agiograficheskikh terminov [Holiness. Concise Dictionary of Hagiographic Terms]. Moscow, “Gnozis”.

  9. Klark K. 2002. Sovetskii roman: istoriya kak ritual [Soviet novel: history as a ritual]. Ekaterinburg, Izd-vo Ural. un-ta. (In Russ.)

  10. Maklyuehn G.M. 2003. Ponimanie Media: Vneshnie rasshireniya cheloveka [Understanding Media: Human External Extensions]. Moscow, ZhukovskiI: KANON- press-Ts-Kuchkovo pole. (In Russ.)

  11. Raevskaya M.M. 2019. Yazykovaya ideologiya kak mental’naya model’ i issledovatel’skaya paradigma [Language Ideology as a Mental Model and Research Paradigm]. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 2, pp. 24–35. (In Russ.)

  12. Tumarkin N. 1997 Lenin zhiv! Kul’t Lenina v Sovetskoi Rossii [Lenin is alive! The cult of Lenin in Soviet Russia]. St. Petersburg, Gum. agenstvo “Akadem, proekt”. (In Russ.)

  13. Uspenskii L.A. 1997. Bogoslovie ikony pravoslavnoi tserkvi. [Theology of the icon of the Orthodox Church]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo bratstva vo imya svyatogo knyazya Aleksandra Nevskogo. URL: https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/Leonid_Uspenskij/bogoslovie-ikony-pravoslavnoj-tserkvi (accessed: 12.08.2019). (In Russ.)

  14. Shatin Yu.V. 1996. Ehstetika agiograficheskogo diskursa v poehme V.V. Mayakovskogo “Vladimir Il’ich Lenin” [Aesthetics of hagiographic discourse in the poem of V.V. Mayakovsky “Vladimir Ilyich Lenin”]. Diskurs, no. 2, pp. 24–30. (In Russ.)

  15. Bonnell V.E. 1997. Iconography of Power: Soviet Political Posters under Lenin and Stalin. Berkeley, CA, University of California Press.