Artemis or Diana? (The Representation of the Ancient Mythological Characters in New Testament Translations)

Abstract

The present paper deals with the representation of the names of the ancient gods in New Testament translations. In the text of the original which was Greek the names of gods were naturally Greek. But as in Antiquity the characters of the Greek mythology were identified with the Roman ones, the text of the Vulgate renders them in Latinized form. Because in Europe before the Reformation the Latin translation was the main and the most authoritative version of the Holy Writ, it had been used as the source text for the rendering of the Bible, even by the authors, who were opposed to Catholic Church (e.g. Wycliffe). After the Reformation, the Catholic translators continued the use of the Vulgate as the original even until the middle of the 20th century. In contrast to them, the Protestants translated the Bible almost exclusively from Hebrew and Greek texts, but often retained the Latin names of the Greek gods until approximately the same period. The Russian tradition of translating the Bible is characterized by some peculiarities. On the one hand, there was a general orientation towards the Greek and Church Slavonic texts; on the other, the influence of the Latin forms also occurred in the early New Testament version edited by the Russian Bible Society in the first quarter of the 19th century.

References

1. Alekseev A.A. 2001. Pervyi russkii perevod Novogo Zaveta v izdanii 1823 g. [First Russian Translation of the New Testament 1823 Edition]. Rol’ perevodov Biblii v stanovlenii i razvitii slavyanskikh literaturnykh yazykov. Moscow, Institut slavyanovedeniya, pp. 7–38. (In Russ.)

2. Desnitskii A.S. Tipichnye oshibki tolkovatelei i pogreshnosti v vospriyatii bibleiskogo teksta [Typical Errors of the Bible Text Commentators]. URL: https://predanie.ru/desnickiy-andrey-sergeevich/book/216966-tipichnye-oshibki-tolkovateley-i-pogreshnosti-vospriyatiya-bibleyskogo-teksta/ (accessed: 07.01.2019). (In Russ.)

3. Miloslavskiy I. 2017. Cel’ kak harakteristika lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya [“Target” as a characteristic of the linguistic research]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 1, pp. 9–23. (In Russ.)

4. Mitropolit Volokolamskii Ilarion (Alfeev). 2016. Istoriya i znachenie Sinodal’nogo perevoda Biblii. [History and Meaning of the Synodal Translation of the Bible] Russkaya Pravoslavnaya Tserkov’. URL: http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/4630008.html (accessed: 06.03.2019). (In Russ.)

5. Mitropolit Volokolamskii Ilarion (Alfeev). 2013. Perevody Biblii: istoriya i sovremennost’ [Bible Translations: History and Modern Times] Russkaya Pravoslavnaya Tserkov’. Otdel vneshnikh tserkovnykh svyazei. URL: https://mospat.ru/ru/2013/11/26/news94805/ (accessed: 06.03.2019). (In Russ.)

6. Tarasenko T.V., Kero Hervilya E.F. 2016. Povsednevnaya kul’tura i ee elementy v hudozhestvennom i perevodnom tekste (Na materiale perevodov na ispanskij yazyk romana M.A. Bulgakova “Master i Margarita”) [Elements of everyday culture in literature and translated texts (based on the translations of the master and margarita novel by Mikhail Bulgakov)]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 3, pp. 14–26. (In Russ.)

7. Tsirkin Yu.B. 2004. Mify Drevnego Rima [Myths of the Ancient Rome]. Moscow, OOO Izdatel’stvo Astrel’. (In Russ.)