What makes a good translation equivalent?

Abstract

When we use bilingual dictionaries, what makes us believe that the translations they offer are valid? Comparing the English nouns smile, grin, smirk, sneer with their translations in bilingual English-Russian and English-French dictionaries, I consider as criteria of translational adequacy the following: ostensive (referential) equivalence, etymology, morphology, phonology, (monolingual) definitional equivalence, (bilingual) reversion (reversibility). The special characteristics of reversion suggest that It might be worth distinguishing translation equivalents (=reversible items typically heteroglossal synonyms) as a hyponymic subset of translations (=heteroglossal definitions). Not considered here (for lack of immediately accessible evidence) is contextual or cotextual equivalence, though it would be significant if items in different languages had similar collocations and colligations.

References

1. Ozhegov S.I. (ed.) 2015. Tolkovyi slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language]. Pod obshch. red. L.I. Skvortsova. Moscow, Mir i Obrazovanie. (In Russ.)

2. Atkins B.T. (ed.) 1981. Collins Robert French-English, English-French Dictionary. Collins.

3. Concise Oxford Dictionary. 2011. Oxford.

4. Katzner K. (ed.) 1994. English-Russian, Russian English Dictionary. NY, Wiley.

5. Le Petit Robert. 1989. Paris.

6. Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary. 2003. Springfield, Mass., USA.

7. O’Brien M.A. (ed.) 1944. New English-Russian, Russian-English Dictionary. NY, Dover.

8. Wolkonsky C., Poltoratzky S. (eds.) 1969. Dictionary of Russian Roots. NY, Columbia University Press.