The Infl uence of Mass Culture on High Culture (A Case Study of the Italian Futurist Theatre)

Abstract

The article analyzes the influence of mass culture on theatre experiments of Italian futurists. Mass culture is considered to be an opposition of elite or high culture because its production has a standard character, it is aimed at entertainment and it is commercial, while high culture is aimed at creating new esthetical experience and serves as a source for mass culture where it is reproduced in a reduced way. However, the study of Italian Futurist theatre of 1910–1920s reveals that it was mass culture that served as a source for the transformation of high culture and the creation of new language of theatre. In particular, Italian futurists turn to such forms of shows as variety theatre and music hall and borrow a number of their practices. In their theatre experiments they aim at changing the idea of theatre and separate it from literature as a different art genre. In order to do so they deny the dominating character of text in favour of other means of expression. Although Futurism as one of avant-garde movements, without doubt, belongs to high culture, it redefines the notion of public and turns to mass audiences trying to get them out of the state of passive perception by attacking their senses instead of their intellect. The avant-garde aims at transforming the world by means of art, and to solve this task it sometimes adopts the formal elements belonging to mass culture.

References

1. Anastasieva I.L. 2019. Neverbalnaya semiotica stsenicheskogo iskusstva [Nonverbal semiotics of the stage]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 4, pp. 88–96. (In Russ.)

2. Bishop C. 2018. Iskusstvenny ad. Participatornoe iskusstvo i politika zritelstva. [Artificial hell. Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship]. Moscow, V-A-C press. (In Russ.)

3. Vtoroy futurism. Manifesty i programmy italianskogo futurisma. 1915–1933. [Second futurism. Manifestos and programs of Italian futurism]. Moscow, Gilea, 2013. (In Russ.)

4. Girin Y.N. 2013. Kartina mira epokhi avangarda. Avangard kak sistemnaja tselostnost. [The worldview of the avant-garde period. Avant-garde as a unity of values]. Moscow, IMLI RAN. (In Russ.)

5. Kostina A.V. 2009. Sootnoshenie i vzaimodeistvie traditsionnoj, elitarnoj i massovoj cultury v sotsialnom prostranstve sovremennosti [Correlation and interaction of traditional, high and mass culture in the contemporary social sphere]: Dissertation … of Dr. habil. in cultural studies Moscow. (In Russ.)

6. Le Bon G. 1896. Psikhologia narodov i mass [A study of the popular mind]. Saint Petersburg, 1896. (In Russ.)

7. Marinetti F.T. 1914. Music hall. Proslavlenie teatra-variete [Glorification of the variety theatre]. Futurism. Saint Petersburg. (In Russ.)

8. Ortega y Gasset J. 1991. Vosstanie mass // Degumanizatsia iskusstva i drugie raboty [The revolt of the masses // The dehumanization of art and other works]. Moscow, Raduga. (In Russ.)

9. Solovyeva Y.O. 2019. Pravo i popularnaja cultura: aspecty i tendentsyy vzaimodeistvija. [Law and popular culture: aspects and tendencies of interaction]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 1, pp. 149–157. (In Russ.)

10. Syrov N.V. 2010. Massovaja cultura: mify i realnost [Mass culture: myths and reality]. Moscow. (In Russ.)

11. Mango L. 2001. Alla scoperta di nuovi sensi. Il tattilismo futurista [The discovery of new senses. The Futurist tactilism]. Napoli, La Città del Sole. (In Ital.)