eLIBRARY ID: 8377
ISSN: 2074-1588

eLIBRARY ID: 8377
ISSN: 2074-1588

En Ru
Cognitive-Functional Perspective on Multicultural Identity Construction in Fiction

Cognitive-Functional Perspective on Multicultural Identity Construction in Fiction

Published: 09/30/2020

Keywords: multicultural identity; intercultural man; constructivist stance on identity; constructing identity in discourse and text

To cite this article

Gretskaya S.S. Cognitive-Functional Perspective on Multicultural Identity Construction in Fiction. // Moscow University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication

Abstract

The paper belongs to a series of articles with a focus on mental models, as construed and actualized in discourse and embodied in texts. Identity is treated as a type of the above-mentioned mental models. Supporting the constructivist stance on identity (in R. Brubaker and F. Cooper’s terms), the author postulates that identity is fragmented, multiple and fluid, being molded and interpreted in discourse, and a function of various historical and sociocultural factors. Using “Quichotte”, a 2019 novel by S. Rushdie, who represents postcolonial literature, the author argues that constructivist stance on identity is a rightful and fruitful approach to exploring identity construction through the prism of fictional texts, the latter seen as results of discursive activity. The purpose of the study is to analyze the writer’s essentially multilevel reflection on multicultural identity in the novel within the novel, taking into account the perspectives of different characters, and describe the means of multicultural identity construction. The conclusion is made that the constructivist approach to understanding identity does not hinder a researcher’s examination of the ways human self-understandings crystallize in texts.

References

  1. Boldyrev N.N. 2016. Kognitivnye skhemy yazykovoi interpretatsii [Cognitive schemas of linguistic interpretation]. Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki, no 4, pp. 10–20. (In Russ.)

  2. Enina L.V. 2016. Identichnost’ kak diskursivnyi kontsept i mekhanizmy diskursivnoi identifikatsii [Identity as a discursive concept and discursive identification mechanisms]. Politicheskaya lingvistika, no 6, pp. 159–167. (In Russ.)

  3. Kubryakova E.S., Aleksandrova O.V. 1997. Vidy prostranstv teksta i diskursa [Varieties of text and discourse space]. Kategorizatsiya mira: prostranstvo i vremya: Materialy nauchnoi konferentsii. Moscow, Dialog-MGU, pp. 15–23. (In Russ.)

  4. Kubryakova E.S. 2004. Yazyk i znanie: na puti polucheniya znanii o yazyke. Chasti rechi s kognitivnoi tochki zreniya. Rol’ yazyka v poznanii mira [Language and knowledge: Towards acquiring the knowledge about language: parts of speech from the cognitive point of view. The role of language in the world cognition]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury. (In Russ.)

  5. Kushneruk S.L. 2018. Razvitie teorii kognitivno-diskursivnogo miromodelirovaniya za rubezhom i v Rossii [The development of cognitive-discourse world-modelling theory in European and Russian linguistics]. Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki, no. 4, pp. 115–125. (In Russ.)

  6. Leontovich O.A. 2017. “Zerkalo, v kotorom kazhdyi pokazyvaet svoi lik”: diskursivnoe konstruirovanie identichnostei [“A mirror in which everyone displays their image”: identity construction in discourse]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: LINGVISTIKA, vol. 21, no 2, pp. 247–259. (In Russ.)

  7. Molchanova G.G. 2017. Kognitivnyi refreiming kak effektivnoe sredstvo predvybornoi argumentatsii (sopostavitel’nyi aspekt) [Cognitive reframing as an effective instrument of the political pre-election 2016 race (the comparative aspect)]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 3, pp. 7–15. (In Russ.)

  8. Robustova V.V. 2014. K kognitivnoi onomastike [On the topic of cognitive onomastics]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 1, pp. 41–49. (In Russ.)

  9. Robustova V.V. 2015. Onomasticheskaya leksika kak sposob verbalizatsii kontseptov [Onomastic lexis as a way of verbalization of concepts]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 2, pp. 20–30. (In Russ.)

  10. Chemyakin E.Yu. 2011. Obraz mul’tikul’turnogo cheloveka v postkolonial’nom diskurse (na primere proizvedenii Salmana Rushdi) [An image of a multicultural person in postcolonial discourse (a study of Salman Rushdie’s novels)]. Istoricheskii ezhegodnik. Sb. nauch. tr. Institut istorii SO RAN. Novosibirsk, pp. 25–34. (In Russ.)

  11. Adler P. 1982. Beyond Cultural Identity: Reflections on Cultural and Multicultural Man. L. Samovar & R. Porter (Eds.) Intercultural Communication: A Reader, 3rd ed. Belmont, CA, Wadsworth, pp. 389–408.

  12. Brubaker R., Cooper F. 2000. Beyond “Identity” Theory and Society, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–47.

  13. Kim Y. 1999. Intercultural Personhood: an Integration of Eastern and Western Perspectives. L. Samovar & R. Porter (Eds.) Intercultural Communication: A Reader, 9th ed. Belmont, CA, Wadsworth, pp. 431–443.

  14. Lutzker D. 1960. Internationalism as a Predictor of Cooperative Behavior. Journal of Conflict Resolution, no 4, pp. 426–430.

  15. Tagore R. 1961. Towards Universal Man. New York, Asia Publishing House.