eLIBRARY ID: 8377
ISSN: 2074-1588
Published: 12/31/2020
Keywords: lexical competence; professional lexical competence; professional lexical competence of a language teacher; pre-service language teacher training
Gushchina Y.A. “Professional Lexical Competence of a Language Teacher”: Revising the Concept. // Moscow University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication 2020. Issue 4. 191-197
Although lexical competence is a part of communicative competence, it has not always been regarded as a priority in the field of language teaching and, therefore, it has failed to receive all the attention that it deserves. Moreover, the urgent need for training highly qualified specialists in language pedagogy places increasing demands on language teachers and their professional training. While a great amount of effort has concentrated on improving teachers’ language proficiency, little has been said and done on developing their skills in terms of professionally-oriented vocabulary. This article examines conceptual features of notions “lexical competence” and “professional lexical competence” concerning the process of training pre-service language teachers. The article also analyzes their actual definitions. Thus, a revised term “professional lexical competence of a language teacher” is introduced. Besides, the article depicts the content of lexical competence and its position within communicative competence of prospective language teachers. As a result of the analysis made, one can consider lexical competence and professional lexical competence regarding the process of training future language teachers as core, interdependent elements that contribute to the ongoing development of professional communicative competence and communicative competence respectively. Finally, steps for designing a training model for pre-service language teachers are enumerated.
Andreenko T.N. 2012. Definitsiya ponyatiya “professional’naya leksicheskaya kompetentsiya uchitelya inostrannogo yazyka” [Definition of the notion “professional lexical competence of a language teacher”]. Educational Psychology in Polycultural Space, no. 2, pp. 22–30. (In Russ.)
Ershova T.A., Korenev A.A. 2016. Ispol’zovanie integrirovannykh zadanii na chtenie i pis’mennuyu rech’ dlya razvitiya professional’no-kommunikativnykh i kognitivnykh umenii studentov pedagogicheskikh spetsial’nostei [Integrated reading into writing tasks for the development of trainee teachers’ professional communicative and cognitive skills]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 1, pp. 159–168. (In Russ.)
Korenev A.A., Semina N.V. 2018. Metodika klassifikatsii oshibok v pedagogicheskoi rechi rossiiskikh uchitelei angliiskogo yazyka (na materiale videozapisei urokov) [Classification of errors methodology in the Russian foreign language teachers’ classroom speaking (a study of video recorded English language lessons)]. Language. Culture. Translation. Communication: collection of research papers, no. 2, pp. 166–172. (In Russ.)
Safonova V.V. 2018. Osnovopolagayushchie printsipy modelirovaniya uchebnoi literatury po teorii i metodike obucheniya mezhkul’turnomu obshcheniyu v vysshei shkole [Fundamental principles for designing pedagogical literature on the methodology of teaching intercultural communication in higher education]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 2, pp. 65–75. (In Russ.)
Fetisova A.A. 2011. Struktura inoyazychnoi leksicheskoi kompetentsii studentov, budushchikh uchitelei inostrannogo yazyka [The structure of lexical competence of future EFL teachers]. Topical issues of philology and language methodology, no. 5, pp. 225–234. (In Russ.)
Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. URL: https://rm.coe.int/1680459f97 (accessed: 19.05.2020)
Nation I. 2001. Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Richards J. 1976. The role of vocabulary teaching. TESOL Quarterly, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 77–89.