The Semiotics of Landmarks and Its Role in the Formation of the Urban Text

Abstract

The article studies urban space as a text of culture, where various semiotic languages interact. With reference to this urban space can be perceived as a complex contexture of space, architecture, people, objects and names, as well as their interrelation in everyday life. The object of study in the article is a phenomenon of urban space landmarks and, on a large scale, the semiotics of landmarks as one of the codes which form and record the urban text. The author endeavors to interpret landmarks as a sign which constitutes a particular sign meta-system where a transmitted sign saves its appurtenance to its initial semiotics, but takes new features. This approach has enabled us to find out the changes in the pragmatics and semantics of signs and to characterize partly the specifics of the syntactics. The detection of semantically motivated correlation between this type of signs seems to contribute to the process of detection of new sense layers in urban texts and to result not only in the reinforcement of cultural memory, but also in the fulfillment of the creative function of the urban text.

References

1. Abashev V.V. 2000. Perm’ kak tekst: Permskii tekst v russkoi kul’ture i literature XX veka [Perm as a text: Perm text in Russian culture and literature of the twentieth century]. Perm’, Izd-vo Permskogo gos. un-ta. (In Russ.)

2. Antsiferov N.P. 1922. Dusha Peterburga [The soul of St. Petersburg]. Peterburg, Izd-vo “Brokgauz i Efron”. (In Russ.)

3. Barbyshev E.N., Somov G.Yu. 1990. Formoobrazuyushchie struktury i arkhitekturnaya forma [The forming of the structure and architectural form]. Arkhitektura SSSR, no. 2, pp. 74–79. (In Russ.)

4. Golovanivskaya M.K. 2013. Legendarnye dorogi Rossii: opyt postroeniya modeli sintaksicheskoi territorial’noi svyaznosti [Legendary Russian roads: building a model of syntactic territorial coherence]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 4, pp. 56–68. (In Russ.)

5. Lotman Yu.M. 2000. Vnutri myslyashchikh mirov [Inside the thinking worlds]. In Lotman Yu.M. Semiosfera [Universe of the mind]. Saint Petersburg, “Iskusstvo–SPb”, pp. 150–390. (In Russ.)

6. Makkanell D. 2016. Turist. Novaya teoriya prazdnogo klassa [The tourist: a new theory of the leisure class]. Moscow, Ad Marginem Press. (In Russ.)

7. Pavlovskaya A.V. 2020. Global’noe vs regional’noe: k voprosu o problemakh mezhkul’turnoi kommunikatsii v global’nom mire [The global vs the regional: concerning problems of intercultural communication in the global world]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 1, pp. 9–21. (In Russ.)

8. Toporov V.N. 2003. Peterburgskii tekst russkoi literatury [Petersburg text of Russian literature]. Saint Petersburg, Iskusstvo-SPB. (In Russ.)