Dynamics of Semantic Content of Russian Ethnonyms in the Discourse of the French of the XVII–XVIII Centuries

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the semantic content of Russian ethnonyms in the written discourse of the French from the XVII century to the period of active cultural contacts. The object of the research is the ethnonymic lexeme Tartare(s), which is a constant of francophone testimonies, so its content can be considered as a part of the cultural representations of the French about the ethnic structure of Russia at this historical period. The semantic content is analyzed by taking into account the concept of the Russian linguist V.A. Nikonov, according to which the name of ethnic communities can be divided into several levels of meaning: pre-ethnonymic or etymological meaning; post-etnonymic, which may not develop; and ethnonymic itself, correlated with the designated object. The problematic aspect of determining the semantic content of ethnonyms is the ambiguity of the correlation between the name and the object designated by it. As a result the main components of the semantic content of the ethnonym Tartare(s) were identified as: appearance of the Mongoloid race; Muslim religion; sub-ethnic division into Kazan, Nogai, and Crimean Tatars; disunited territorial location; features of interaction with Russia. The analysis of dynamics revealed trends in changes in the semantic content of the ethnonym Tartare(s), whose connotations shift over the specified period towards positive values. The image of the enemy in the view of the French is changing to the image of an ally and a Russian national. The increase in the territorial and cultural disunity of the Tatars and the partial assimilation of the Tatar people in Russian culture contributed to this fact. The experience of direct or indirect cultural interaction allowed the French to identify the objects of the nomination of the ethnonym Tartare(s) and expand the scope of its additional meanings.

References

1. Ageeva R.A. 2000. Kakogo my rodu-plemeni? [Where did we come from?]. Moscow, Academia Publ. (In Russ.)

2. Benvenist E. 1974. Obshchaya lingvistika [General Linguistics]. Moscow, Progress Publ. (In Russ.)

3. Borisova I.Z. 2019. Bliny/Crêpes kak marker bretonskoi regional’noi identichnosti [Pancakes / Crêpes as a brand of Breton Regional Identity]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 4, pp. 80–87. (In Russ.)

4. Zagrjazkina T.Ju. 2013. Rech’ o francuzskom jazyke i problema jazykovogo mnogoobrazija [Speech on the French language and the problem of linguistic diversity]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 2, pp. 52–63. (In Russ.)

5. Kalutskov V.N. 2018. Gratter le Russe et vous trouverez le Tartare, ili o sud’be odnoi mifologicheskoi strany [Scratch a Russian and you will find a Tatar, or about the fate of a mythological country]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 1, pp. 87–99. (In Russ.)

6. Kordt V.A. 1899. Materialy po istorii russkoi kartografii. Vyp.I: Karty po vsei Rossii i yuzhnykh” eya oblastei do poloviny XVII veka [Materials on the history of Russian cartography. Issue I: Maps throughout Russia and its southern regions up to the half of the XVII century. Appendix XI.]. Kiev, Printing establishment of C.V. Kulzhenko Publ. (In Russ.)

7. Nikonov V.A. 1970. Etnonimiya [Ethnonymics]. In Nikonov V.A. (ed.) Etnonimy [Ethnonyms]. Moscow, Nauka Publ, pp. 4–30. (In Russ.)

8. Superanskaja A.V. 2007. Obshhaja teorija imeni sobstvennogo [General theory of proper name]. Moscow, LKI Publ. (In Russ.)

9. D’Auteroche J.-C. 1768. Voyage en Sibérie. Vol.1. Paris, Chez Debure.

10. Margeret (Capitaine), Chevreul H. 1860. Estat de l`Empire de Russie et grande duché de Moscovie. Paris, Chez le Potier.