Discourse on Female Identity in the Works of Christine

Abstract

The article is devoted to the gender aspect of literary studies based on the works of the French writer and poetess Christine de Pisan (1364–1430).

The attitude towards “masculine” and “feminine” behavior has dominated for many centuries and has not lost its influence in modern society. The privilege of the patriarchal view in traditional culture also applies to the traditional cultural text. The development of gender studies in the second half of the twentieth century contributed to the interpretation of gender as a discursive phenomenon by its nature. These studies enhanced the differentiation of texts as cultural phenomena into “masculine” and “feminine” types in modern philosophical and cultural studies. The purpose of the study is to identify and explain the features of discursive practices as a reflection of specific female subjectivity. The article analyzes the main features of “masculine” and “feminine” discourse. The concept of “feminine writing” (écriture féminine, H. Cixous’s term), “feminine style of writing” (Derrida’s term) are specified, special attention is paid to the issues of representation and constructiveness of the subject. A specific nature of the discourse on female identity is analyzed using the works of Christina de Pisan as an example, who laid the foundation for the tradition of women’s essays in support of female representatives (“Book of Fortune’s Transformation” (Le Livre de la Mutation de Fortune, 1403); “The Book of the City of Ladies” (Le livre de la Cité des Dames, 1405). The conclusion is made about the interconnection between the intellectual side of women’s identity and the issues of women’s education in this type of discourse, where women’s education is a necessary condition for the transition of women from the role of an object to the role of a subject of culture.

References

1. Vorobieva S.Yu. 2013. Problema “Zhenskogo pis’ma” v kontekste teorii diskursa [The problem of “Women’s writing” in the context of the theory of discourse]. Volgograd State University Bulletin. Series 2. Linguistics, no. 2. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problema-zhenskogo-pisma-v-kontekste-teorii-diskursa-1 (accessed: 30.01.2021). (In Russ.)

2. Zagryazkina T.Yu. 2014. Madame-monsieur-mademoiselle: gender i pol skvoz’ prizmu yazyka i kul’tury [Madame-monsieur-mademoiselle: gender and gender through the prism of language and culture]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 4, pp. 9–37. (In Russ.)

3. Zagryazkina T.Yu. 2015. Frantsiya i frankofoniya: yazyk, obshchestvo, kul’tura [France and Francophonie: language, society, culture]. Moscow, Moscow State University. (In Russ.)

4. Zagryazkina T.Yu. 2014. Drugoy, ili Gender i pol v yazyke i kul’ture Frantsii [Another, or Gender and gender in the language and culture of France]. In Frankofoniya: Cotsial’nyye aspekty yazyka i kul’tury [Francophonie: Social aspects of language and culture: collection]. Moscow, KDU, рр. 8–37. (In Russ.)

5. Derrida J. 1991. Shpory: stili Nitsshe [Spurs: Nietzsche’s styles]. Philosophical sciences, no. 2, рр. 118–129. (In Russ.)

6. Malygina A.V. 2008. Gendernyye aspekty kak teksty kul’tury (na primere mody serediny XX — nachala XXI vv.) [Gender aspects as texts of culture (on the example of fashion in the middle of the XX — beginning of the XXI centuries)]. Author’s abstract. dis. Cand. philosophy. sciences. Moscow. (In Russ.)

7. Ryutkönen M. 2000. Gender i literatura: problema “zhenskogo pis’ma” i “zhenskogo chteniya” [Gender and literature: the problem of “women’s writing” and “women’s reading”]. Philological sciences, no. 3, pp. 5–17. URL: http://www.a-z.ru/women_cd1 (accessed: 30.01.2021). (In Russ.)

8. Ryabova T.B. 1999. Zhenshchina v istorii zapadnoyevropeyskogo srednevekov’ya [Woman in the history of the Western European Middle Ages]. Ivanovo, Publishing Center “Yunona”. (In Russ.)

9. Uspenskaya V.I. 2003. Teoreticheskaya reabilitatsiya zhenshchin v proizvedeniyakh Kristiny Pizanskoy. Posobiye k kursu po istorii feminizma [Theoretical rehabilitation of women in the works of Christine de Pisan. Manual for the course on the history of feminism.]. Tver, FeministPress. (In Russ.)

10. Cixous H. 2001. Khokhot Meduzy [Le rire de la méduse]. In Vvedeniye v gendernyye issledovaniya [Introduction to gender studies]. Part 2. St. Petersburg, Aleteya, рр. 799–821. (In Russ.)

11. Berriot-Salvadore E. 1983. Les femmes et les pratiques de l’écriture de Christine de Pisan à Marie de Gournay. In Bulletin de l’Association d’étude sur l’humanisme, la réforme et la renaissance, no. 16, pp. 52– 69. URL: www.persee.fr/doc/rhren_0181-6799_1983_num_16_1_1327 (accessed: 30.01.2021). (In French)

12. Kristeva J. 1981. Le langage, cet inconnu. Une initiation à la linguistique. Paris, Seuil. (In French)

13. Miller N. 1988. Subject to change. Reading feminist writing. New York.