Landscape Genre as an Object of Criticism in Soviet Culture at the Turn of the 1920s–1930s

Abstract

The turn of the 1920s–1930s is one of the most controversial periods in the history of Soviet culture. There are still many gaps in its study. In particular, the problem of transforming creative and ideological programs of many post-revolutionary art associations remains insufficiently analyzed. The article examines the most influential art organization of the post-revolutionary period — the Association of Artists of Revolution (AKhRR) — taking a more radical stance towards the landscape genre. Initially neutral, this position became extremely critical, even intolerable at the turn of the 1920s and 1930s. An analysis of dozens of articles written by the ideologues of AKhRR reveals the ways how new, “revolutionary” criteria for describing and evaluating landscape paintings were developed and how an extensive system of accusations and a set of mandatory requirements for the genre were formed. Landscape was mostly seen as a “reactionary” genre, that made it possible to hide from modern reality, or, on the contrary, to “smuggle” in the Soviet art alien bourgeois values. The changing attitude towards the landscape also makes it possible to trace the transformation of emotional matrix of the era — the refusal to convey complex feelings, that for a long time were perceived as a basic characteristic of Russian landscape painting. The system of denying the landscape, so carefully developed by the members of the Association, was rejected by Soviet culture already in the mid-1930s. However, the events of the turn of the 1920s and 1930s demonstrate how the pictorial genre became a hostage to the movement of culture towards more radical, “leftist” ideological attitudes.

References

1. Golomshtok I. 1994.Totalitarnoe iskusstvo [Totalitarian art]. Moscow, «Galart». (In Russ.)

2. Grois B. 2013. Gesamtkunstwerk Stalin [Gesamtkunstwerk Stalin]. Moscow, “Ad Marginem Press”. (In Russ.)

3. Degot’ E.Yu. 2000. Russkoe iskusstvo XX veka [Russian art of the XXth century]. Moscow, “Trilistnik”. (In Russ.)

4. Degot’ E.Yu. 2010. Esteticheskaya revolyutsiya kul’turnoi revolyutsii, ili Kontseptual’nyi realizm [The Aesthetic Revolution of the Cultural Revolution, or Conceptual Realism]. Nashe nasledie, no. 93–94, рp. 135–147. (In Russ.)

5. Mamedov G., Shatalova O. 2014. Iskusstvo v massy: khudozhestvennye praktiki kul’turnoi revolyutsii 1920–1930-kh godov v Tsentral’noi Azii [Art to the masses: artistic practices of the Cultural Revolution of the 1920s–1930s in Central Asia]. Vernut’ budushchee. URL: https://theoryandpractice.ru/posts/8701-vernut-budushee (accessed: 12.03.2022). (In Russ.)

6. Manin V.S. 2008. Iskusstvo i vlast’. Bor’ba techenii v sovetskom izobrazitel’nom iskusstve 1917–1941 godov. Saint Petersburg, «Avrora». (In Russ.)

7. Manin V.S. 1999. Iskusstvo v rezervatsii. Khudozhestvennaya zhizn’ Rossii 1917–1941 gg. [Art and power. Struggle of currents in the Soviet fine arts of 1917–1941]. Moscow, «Editorial URSS». (In Russ.)

8. Morozov A.I. 1995. Konets utopii. Iz istorii iskusstva v SSSR 1930-kh godov [The end of utopia. From the history of art in the USSR of the 1930s]. Moscow, «Galart». (In Russ.)

9. Papernyi V.Z. 1996. Kul’tura Dva [Culture Two]. Moscow, «Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie» . (In Russ.)