eLIBRARY ID: 8377
ISSN: 2074-1588
Recieved: 04/16/2022
Accepted: 05/18/2022
Published: 12/31/2022
Keywords: linguoculturology; semiotics; cultural code; gastronomic culture; sensory channels; classification of symbols; mythological and moral symbols
DOI Number: 10.55959/MSU-2074-1588-19-2022-4-60-72
Dorzhieva G.S., Gao Jiango Linguosemiotic Content and Functional Characteristics of Food Rituals (Using the Example of Chinese Grocery Stores). // Moscow University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication 2022. Issue 4. 60-72 https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU-2074-1588-19-2022-4-60-72.
The article examines the linguosemiotic content and functional characteristics of food rituals, which are a symbolic representation of folk beliefs, tra- ditional knowledge and collective experience relevant to this society. The study of the semiotics of gastronomic culture involves the analysis of factors that have influenced the modern cultural context in which certain gastronyms are endowed with symbolic properties. The article gives a classification of symbols by form and content: 1) according to the degree of complexity: simple (egg, noodles) and complex (Fish Ceremony); 2) according to the level of abstraction: concrete (lotus, round gingerbread) — abstract (dragon, phoenix); 3) according to the form of their expression: graphic (hieroglyphs chun lian 春联, chūnlián) — wishes of happiness, well–being before the New Year and subject (flashlight, seeds); 4) auditory — songs and poems dedicated to the Moon Holiday; 5) gestural — the choice of dishes for the festive table; 6) by origin: natural symbols (bamboo, fish) — artificial (yin and yang).
Depending on the functions, the article examines two groups of culinary symbols: mythological (egg — Food of the five virtues) and moral symbols (ducks — happiness). Semiotic studies of gastronomic linguoculture bring us closer to understanding not only the culture of individual peoples, but also the aesthetic universals and psychological constants of humanity.
Alexandrova O.V. 2021. Mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya i ee simvoly [Intercultural communication and its symbols]. Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 19. Linguistics and intercultural communication, no. 2, pp. 50–56. (In Russ.)
Assman Ya. 2004. Kul`turnaya pamyat`: pis`mo, pamyat` o proshlom i politicheskaya identichnost` v vy`sokix kul`turax drevnosti [Cultural memory: writing, memory of the past and political identity in the high cultures of antiquity]. Moscow, Yazy`kislavyanskojkul`tury`. (In Russ.)
Benveniste E. 1974. Semiologia linguae [Semiology of language] In E. Benveniste (ed.) General Linguistics [General Linguistics]. Moscow, pp. 69–89. (In Russ.)
Zagryazkina T.Yu. 2016. Povsednevnoe I e`ksklyuzivnoe v kul`ture I yazy`ke franczuzskoj kuxni [Casual and exclusive in the culture and language of French cuisine]. Istoriyaedy` itradiciipitaniyanarodovmira mat-ly` II mezhd. simpoz. [The history of food and food traditions of the peoples of the world: materials of II int. sympos]. Vy`p. 2. Moscow, pp. 64–75. (In Russ.)
Zemskova A.Yu. 2009. Lingvosemioticheskie kharakteristiki angloyazy`chnogo gastronomicheskogo diskursa: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. [Nauk Linguo-semiotic characteristics of the English-language gastronomic discourse Abstract of the thesis. dis. cand. philol. Sciences]. Volgograd. (In Russ.)
Kitajskaya kukhnya. 2002. [Chinese cuisine]. Moscow, Izd-vo E`ksmo. (In Russ.)
Lotman Yu.M. 1999. Vnutrimy`slyashikhmirov. Chelovek — tekst — semiosfera — istoriya [Inside the thinking worlds. Man — text — semiosphere — history]. Moscow, Yazy`kirusskojkul`tury`. (In Russ.)
Molchanova G.G. 2021. Mifodizain kak instrument prevrashcheniya soznaniya [Myth design as a tool for transforming consciousness]. Cognitive Studies of Language, no. 1(44), pp. 452–459. (In Russ.)
Mechkovskaya N.B. 2004. Semiotika: Yazy`k. Priroda. Kul`tura [Semiotics: Language. Nature. culture]. Moscow, “Akademiya”. (In Russ.)
Pavlovskaya A.V. 2021. “Rostbif Staroi Anglii”: myaso kak faktor natsional’noi identichnosti britantsev [“Old England roast beef”: meat as a factor in the national identity of the British]. Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series Linguistics and intercultural communication, no. 1, pp. 100–116. (In Russ.)
Pleskachevskaya I.N. 2018. Podnebesnaya strana [Celestial country]. Moscow, Shans. (In Russ.)
Rassadina S.A. 2021. Pishhevy`e mifologemy` v period pandemii [Food myths during the pandemic]. Tradicionnaya kul`tura v sovremennom mire. Istoriya edy` i tradicii pitaniya narodov mira: mat-ly` V mezhd. nauchno-prakt. simpoz [Traditional culture in the modern world. The history of food and food traditions of the peoples of the world: materials of the V int. scientific and practical. sympos]. Moscow, Novoevremya, pp. 360–371. (In Russ.)
Rikyor P. 2004. Pamyat`, istoriya, zabvenie [Memory, history, oblivion]. Moscow. (In Russ.)
SLT: Slovar` lingvokul`turologicheskikh terminov [Dictionary of linguistic and cultural terms]. 2017. Avtory`-sost. Kovshova M.L., Gudkov D.B. (eds.) Moscow, Gnozis. (In Russ.)
Stepanov Yu.S. 2015. Semiotics [Semiotics]. Moscow. (In Russ.)
Tresidder Dzh. 1999. Slovar` simvolov [Symbol Dictionary]. Per. s angl. S. Pal`ko. Moscow, FAIR-PRESS. (In Russ.)
Shhepin K. 2021. Kitaj kulinarny` j [China culinary]. Moscow, Shans. (In Russ.)