eLIBRARY ID: 8377
ISSN: 2074-1588

eLIBRARY ID: 8377
ISSN: 2074-1588

En Ru
The Concept of the Training Course “Language and geographical space” (Within the Framework of the Master’s Program “Communicative Codes in Modern Intercultural Space”)

The Concept of the Training Course “Language and geographical space” (Within the Framework of the Master’s Program “Communicative Codes in Modern Intercultural Space”)

Recieved: 04/10/2022

Accepted: 05/18/2022

Published: 12/31/2022

Keywords: renaming; toponym; geographical name; geoconcept; conceptualization of geographical space; geographical picture of the world

DOI Number: 10.55959/MSU-2074-1588-19-2022-4-33-42

To cite this article

Kalutskov V.N. The Concept of the Training Course “Language and geographical space” (Within the Framework of the Master’s Program “Communicative Codes in Modern Intercultural Space”). // Moscow University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication 2022. Issue 4. 33-42 https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU-2074-1588-19-2022-4-33-42.

Issue 4, 2022

Abstract

The course “Language and geographical space” is aimed at the study of modern dynamic linguistic and geographical situations associated with new political and cultural realities. At the same time, the approaches of cultural geography and critical toponymy are the main ones in the course. The key to the course is the problem of renaming geographical objects based on new ideologies and political attitudes. A comprehensive cultural and geographical approach considers renaming as an innovative and adaptive socio-cultural process. Mass renaming in cities leads to the replacement of one cultural and linguistic landscape with another, and widespread renaming of cities leads to the creation of a new geocultural space of the country. It is important to have an idea of the geographical picture of the world, which is solved on the basis of attracting various maps of the world; for linguists, familiarity with the possibilities of the cartographic method is useful. As a result, the course expands the scientific horizons and methodological arsenal of Master’s degree students.

References

  1. Alderman D.H., Inwood J. 2013. Street naming and the politics of belonging: spatial injustices in the toponymic commemoration of Martin Luther King. Social & Cultural Geography, vol. 14, pp. 211–233.

  2. Azaryahu M. 1997. German reunification and the politics of street names: the case of East Berlin. Political Geography, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 479–493.

  3. Azaryahu M. 2009. Street Names and Iconography. In R. Kitchin (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. London, Elsevier Ltd., pp. 460–465.

  4. Basik S.N. 2018. Kriticheskaya toponimika kak napravleniye geograficheskikh issledovaniy: problemy i perspektivy [Critical toponymy as a direction of geographical research: problems and prospects]. Geograficheskiy vestnik, no. 1(44), pp. 56–63. (In Russ.)

  5. David J. 2013. Street Names — Between Ideology and Cultural Heritage. Acta onomastica, vol. 54, pр. 53–60.

  6. Kalutskov V.N. 2020. Kontseptualizatsiya geograficheskogo prostranstva: onomasticheskiye aspekty [Conceptualization of geographical space: onomastic aspects]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 1, pp. 57–69. (In Russ.)

  7. Kalutskov V.N., Dubinina I.S. 2021. Yug SShA: smena prostranstvennykh kulturnykh kodov v gorodskikh landshaftakh [South of the USA: changing spatial cultural codes in urban landscapes]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 3, pp. 165–175. (In Russ.)

  8. Mitin I.I. 2020. Voobrazheniye i mnozhestvennost: pereimenovaniya kak faktor transformatsii gorodskikh kulturnykh landshaftov [Imagination and multiplicity: Renaming as a factor of transformation of urban cultural landscapes]. In D.N. Zamyatina, I.G. Konovalovoy (eds.) Kulturnyy landshaft: Evolyutsii i revolyutsii voobrazheniya. Materialy Vserossiyskoy mezhdistsiplinarnoy nauchnoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiyem (Moskva. 26–27 marta 2020 g.). Moscow, pp. 100–106. (In Russ.)

  9. Molchanova G.G. 2021. Generatsionnaya polikodovost kommunikativnykh modusov. Kakoy on. chelovek novogo pokoleniya? [Generational polycode of communicative modes. What is he like, a man of a new generation?]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 2, pp. 9–17. (In Russ.)

  10. Rose-Redwood R., Alderman D., Azaryahu M. 2010. Geographies of toponymic inscription: new directions in critical place-name studies. Progress in Human Geography, vol. 34, no. 4, рp. 453–470.

  11. Terentyev E.A. 2015.Toponimicheskiy aktivizm i “pravo na gorod”: sotsiologicheskiye zametki [Toponymic activism and the “right to the city”: sociological notes]. Vestn. Tomsk. gos. un-ta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya, no. 1 (29), pp. 194–202. (In Russ.)

  12. Vuolteenaho J., Berg L.D. 2009. Towards critical toponymies. In L. Berg, J. Vuolteenaho (eds.). Critical toponymies: the contested politics of place naming. Farnham, Surrey; Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing, рр. 1–18.