eLIBRARY ID: 8377
ISSN: 2074-1588

eLIBRARY ID: 8377
ISSN: 2074-1588

En Ru
The COVID-19 Pandemic and Issues in the Preservation of Traditional Culture

The COVID-19 Pandemic and Issues in the Preservation of Traditional Culture

Published: 09/30/2021

Keywords: : COVID-19 Pandemic; Lockdown; Tradition; Cultural Globalization; National Characters

To cite this article

Pavlovskaya A.V. The COVID-19 Pandemic and Issues in the Preservation of Traditional Culture. // Moscow University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication 2021. Issue 3. 150-164

Issue 3, 2021

Abstract

This article deals with the issues related to the preservation of traditional culture in times of the crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Today the world is mostly concerned about the biological aspects of the problem: when the pandemic will end, what the consequences will be, and how many people will survive. Another aspect that is given prominence is the economic effects, which for many nations are also connected with the issues of survival, prospects of massive impoverishment, unemployment and famine. Next on the scale of modern values comes the political dimension of the problem: not all country leaders and political systems have stood the test of a serious crisis. Finally, at the bottom of the list are cultural issues, “culture” understood in a broad sense as a way of life, traditions, mentality, communication patterns (both at the local and international level) of the world’s different peoples. Clearly, the crisis of “culture” does not immediately provoke any tragic outcomes – death, famine, disease – but it has far-reaching, delayed consequences, which, in a sense, are no less disastrous than biological, economic or political ones. These issues are discussed in this article.

References

  1. Molchanova G.G. 2016. Kto boitsya Geert Hofstede? Prepodavanie mezhkul’turnoj kommunikacii i perevoda v usloviyah narastayushchej kul’turnoj gibridnosti [Who Is Afraid of Geert Hofstede?]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 4, pp. 3–16. (In Russ.)

  2. Pavlovskiy I.V. 2016. O bytovanii reversnoj personifikacii v regionah realizovannoj i nerealizovannoj kul’tur [The Existence Of Reverse Personification In Regions With “Implemented” And “Wasted” Cultures]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 3, pp. 145–157. (In Russ.)

  3. Walden B. 2002. Deglobalization: Ideas for a New World Economy, Worlds Apart: Civil Society and the Battle for Ethical Globalization. Global Issues.

  4. Kulich S.J., Komisarof A., Ripley Smith L., Cushner K. 2021. Re-examining intercultural research and relations in the COVID pandemic. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. Vol. 80, pp. A1–A6.

  5. Manshur M.F. 2020. Covid-19 and Anti-Globalization Issues: A Cultural Perspective. Journal of Crirital Reviews, no. 7(14), pp. 209–213.

  6. Roudometof V. 2016. Glocalization: A Critical Introduction. Routledge.

  7. Ter-Minasova S.G. 2017. Challenges of intercultural communication: a view from Russia. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 4, pp. 4–16.