Semantic and Conceptual Characteristics of Terms in the Context of Interdisciplinary Research (Based on the Material of the French Language)

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of polyfunctionalism of terms that arise in the process of interdisciplinary contacts and intercultural communication. The purpose of the study: to consider the features of the semantics of terms in the context of interdisciplinary contacts. The object of research in the article is the multifunctional term and concept of architectonics (l’architectonie) in scientific, cultural and public discourses. The task is to generalize the practice of using the term as a factor of synergistic thinking. This topic is relevant in the context of expanding the boundaries of the scientific worldview. Methodology: the study was conducted using methods of comparative analysis and synthesis of information, scientific search and comparison of the vocabulary of the French and Russian languages. The results are obtained on the basis of a wide range of contexts related to the concept of “architectonics”. The translation of the French word l’architectonie into Russian has led to the concept of “architectonics” being integrated on a large scale into Russian science and culture. Having received a new content in the Russian philosophy of the twentieth century, this term is actively used in the language of science. The findings support the hypothesis that the synergy of interdisciplinary research enriches the cognitive space of language and contributes to expanding the boundaries of the scientific picture of the world.

References

1. Aleksandrova O.V. 2014. The formation of the conceptual picture of the world on the basis of the study of lexical and grammatical system of the language. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 3, pp. 19–27. (In Russ.)

2. Budagov R.A. 2004. Humanities and natural sciences. Their interconnections, rejection and parallelism. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 4, pp. 49–57. (In Russ.)

3. Vinogradov V.V. 1976. Poehtika russkoi literatury: Izbr. Trudy [Poetics of Russian Literature: selected works]. Moscow, Nauka. (In Russ.)

4. Vollis A. 2018. Sozertsanie. Sbornik stikhov [Contemplation. Poetry collection]. Moscow, Gnozis. (In Russ.)

5. Voloshinov A.V. 1992. Matematika i iskusstvo [Mathematics and art]. Moscow, Prosveshchenie. (In Russ.)

6. Edlichko A.I. 2019. Applied terminology as a direction of state language policy. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 3, pp. 19–27. (In Russ.)

7. Komarova A.I. 2019. The use of figures of speech in the language of geography. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 3, pp. 9–18. (In Russ.)

8. Leichik V.M. 2007. Terminovedenie: Predmet, metody, struktura [Terminology: Subject, methods, structure]. 3rd ed. Moscow. (In Russ.)

9. Novyi ehntsiklopedicheskii slovar’ [New encyclopedic dictionary]. Moscow, Bol’shaya Rossiiskaya ehntsiklopediya, RIPOL KLASSIK, 2002. (In Russ.)

10. Pishchik A.M., Efimov A.E. 2020. Evolyutsiya i arkhitektonika russkogo mirovozzreniya: tsiklogenez paradigm [Evolution and architectonics of the Russian worldview: cyclogenesis of paradigms]. Natsional’naya Assotsiatsiya Uchenykh. Problemy Filosofskikh nauk, no. 52(1), pp. 8–12. DOI: 10.31618/ nas.2413-5291.2020.1.52.137. (In Russ.)

11. Poetika: Slovar’ aktual’nykh terminov-ponyatii [Poetics: Dictionary of actual terms and concepts] / In N.D. Tamarchenko (ed.). 2008. Moscow, Izd-vo Kulaginoiyu Intrada, pp. 24–25. (In Russ.)

12. Labarre G., Bru H. 2010. Chronique d’Orient. Chronique 2010. Dialogues d’histoire ancienne, no. 36/2, pp. 165–222. DOI: 10.3917/dha.0165.

13. Montreil P.O. 2013. “L’englobant/englobé”, selon Ricoeur: une critique implicite de la raison néolibérale. Raisons politiques, no. 52, pp. 109–122. DOI: 10.3917/rai.052.01.09.

14. Le PetitLAROUSSE. 2007. Paris, LAROUSSE.

15. Sachot M. 2008. Du chrisianisme au libéralisme. Médium, no. 15(2), pp. 5-24. https://DOI.org/10.3919/medium.015.0005.

16. Ybrahim A. 1999. Matières des métaphores, métaphores de la matière. Recherches sur Diderot et sur l’Encyclopédie, no. 26. DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/rde.1001.