eLIBRARY ID: 8377
ISSN: 2074-1588

eLIBRARY ID: 8377
ISSN: 2074-1588

En Ru
Paronymic attraction as a means of text polycodal decoding

Paronymic attraction as a means of text polycodal decoding

Recieved: 04/17/2022

Accepted: 05/18/2022

Published: 09/30/2022

Keywords: polycodeness; ambiguity; paronymic attraction; pun; wordplay; decoding; phraseological units; political discourse

Available online: 30.09.2022

To cite this article

Molchanova G.G. Paronymic attraction as a means of text polycodal decoding. // Moscow University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication 2022. Issue 3. 9-16

Issue 3, 2022

Abstract

The paper deals with the issue of decoding and functional characteristics of such stylistic device as pun or play of words in a literary text, paying special attention to one of its main subdivisions — paronymic attraction. On the extensive linguistic material (more than 600 pages) the most important decoding stylistic functions of this phenomenon (such as evaluative, expressive, characterizing, etc.) have been identifi ed, and the initial hypothesis that paronymic attraction may be closely tied up with all the language system levels, not only phonetic, has been proved. Besides that, the role of communicative, informative and expressive functioning of this stylistic device was established not only in the humouristic literary texts, but in the most serious political discourses as well.

References

  1. Akhmanova O.S. 1969. Slovar lingvisticheskih terminov. Moscow. (In Russ.)

  2. Vinogradov V.V. 1976. O jazike khudozgestvennoi literaturi. Moscow. (In Russ.)

  3. Gretskaya S.S. 2021. K voprosu o “kaleidoskopitcheskih” kontseptah v lingvistike. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 3, pp. 83–92. (In Russ.)

  4. Davidova V.A. 2021. Razvernutaya kognitivnaya metafora kak eksponent metaforitcheskoi klasterizatsiiv diskurse polititcheskogo lidera. Moscow State Univer sity Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 3, pp. 103–111. (In Russ.)

  5. Empson W. 1965.Seven types of ambiguity. Edinburg.

  6. Fitzgeralld F.S. 2007. Tender is the night. London.

  7. Jacobson R. 1960. Linguistics and Poetics. Style and Language. Mass.

  8. Kelly L.G. 1971. Punning and the linguistic sign. Linguistics, vol.66.

  9. Lakoff G. 1970. A note on vagueness and ambiguity. Linguistic Inquiry. Cambr., Mass., vol.1.

  10. Оnysko A.A. 2016. Note on the relation between cognitive linguistics and wordplay. Crossing language to play with words: multidisciplinary perspective. Berlin, De Gruyter.

  11. Show I. 2018. Whispers in Bedlam. God was here but he left early. London.

  12. Donald Trump’s message for the Proud Boys to ‘stand back and stand by’ meaning explained. URL: https://www.thefocus.news/opinion/proud-boys-stand-back-andstand- by-meaning (accessed: 12.04.2022)