eLIBRARY ID: 8377
ISSN: 2074-1588

eLIBRARY ID: 8377
ISSN: 2074-1588

En Ru
National-cultural features of the image of the teacher in the Russian and Chinese languages

National-cultural features of the image of the teacher in the Russian and Chinese languages

Recieved: 05/12/2025

Accepted: 06/27/2025

Published: 09/19/2025

Keywords: Russian language; Chinese language; image of the teacher; cultural standard; cognitive metaphor; national-cultural component; cultural transmission

DOI Number: 10.55959/MSU-2074-1588-19-28-3-8

Available online: 17.10.2025

To cite this article

Bogdanova L.I. , Xu Liyun National-cultural features of the image of the teacher in the Russian and Chinese languages. // Moscow University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication 2025. Vol. 28. Issue 3. 137-155 https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU-2074-1588-19-28-3-8.

Issue 3, 2025

Abstract

The article examines the ethnocultural features of the teacher’s image, identified on the basis of the analysis of linguistic data of the Russian and Chinese languages. The study was carried out on the material of dictionaries and text corpora of the two languages. The purpose of the work is to determine the general and national-specific features in the formation of the teacher’s image in the Russian and Chinese languages. The object of the study is the definitions of the words eacher / female teacher in the dictionaries of the Russian and Chinese languages, as well as comparisons, proverbs, sayings, precedent statements about the teacher in the Russian and Chinese linguistic cultures. National-cultural coding of the teacher’s image also occurs with the help of a number of cultural standards that differently reflect the dominant features of this concept as a socio-cultural value characterizing Russian and Chinese cultures. The study revealed that in Russian the words teacher and female teacher differ in their evaluative and value-based conceptualization. By established tradition, education in contemporary Russian schools is predominantly associated with the image of a woman, that is, the female teacher. In Chinese culture, the teacher in gender terms is traditionally often described as a man, a noble man. In Chinese culture and its linguistic reflection, the image of the teacher occupies a strong, unshakable position, determined by the ideas of Confucius. In Russian linguoculture, the image of the teacher receives additional connotations due to socio-economic factors. The results of this study can be used in lexicographic practice and in teaching Russian and Chinese.

References

  1. Arutyunova N.D. 1990. Metafora i diskurs [Metaphor and discourse]. In Teoriya metafory. Sb. statei [Theory of metaphor] / Ed. N.D. Arutyunova. Moscow, pp. 5–32. (In Russ.)

  2. Bogdanova L.I. 2022. Tsennosti I otsenki v protsesse kulturnoj transmissii [Values and Estimates in Cultural Transmission]. Bulletin of Moscow University. Ser. 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communcation, no. 2, pp. 9–19. (In Russ.)

  3. Bogdanova L.I., Xu L. 2024. Kul’turnye etalony skromnosti v russkom i kitayskom yazykakh [Cultural standards of modesty in the Russian and Chinese languages]. Lomonosov Linguistics and Intercultural Communication Journal, no. 3, pp. 43–61. (In Russ.)

  4. Yerkovich P.S. 2018. Lingvokul’turnye tipazhi «uchitel’» i «teacher» v russkoy i amerikanskoy lingvokul’turakh [Linguocultural types of “teacher” and “teacher” in Russian and American linguacultures]. Scientific notes of Pacific National University, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 116–122. (In Russ.)

  5. Kan Ye.V. 2015. Kontsept «uchitel’» v russkoy lingvokul’ture [The concept of “teacher” in Russian linguaculture] Humanitarian scientific research, no. 12. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://human.snauka.ru/2015/12/13263 (date of access: 07.05.2025). (In Russ.)

  6. Karasik V.I. 2000. O tipakh diskursa [On the types of discourse]. Language personality: institutional and personal discourse, Volgograd, pp. 5–20. (In Russ.)

  7. Lakoff G., Johnson M. 2004. Metaphors we live by. Moscow. (In Russ.)

  8. Molchanova G.G. 2022. 10-ya Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferenciya «Uchitel’. Uchenik. Uchebnik (v kontekste globai’nykh vyzovov sovremennosti) » [10th International Scientific and Practical Conference “Teacher. Student. Textbook (in the context of global challenges of our time)”]. Bulletin of Moscow University. Ser. 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communcation, no. 2, pp. 177–184. (In Russ.)

  9. Molchanova G.G. 2023. Smyslopreobrazuyushchaya rol’ metafory v kontekste radial’nogo rasshireniya kontsepta [The meaning-transforming role of metaphor in the context of the radial expansion of the concept]. Bulletin of Moscow University. Ser. 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communcation, no. 2, pp. 9–20.

  10. Teliya V.N. 1996. Russkaya frazeologiya. Semanticheskiy, pragmaticheskiy i lingvokul’turologicheskiy aspekty [Russian phraseology. Semantic, pragmatic and linguocultural aspects]. Moscow. (In Russ.)

  11. Lin’ Chunde. 2023. 林崇德. 加强师德师风建设必须处理好八个关系. [Eight Relationships that Must Be Handled to Promote Teacher Morality and Teacher Style]. Education Sciences in China, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 61–66, 127. (In Chinese)

  12. Kovecses Zoltan. 2010. Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford university press.

  13. Lakoff George. 1986. Frame semantic control of the coordinate structure constraint. In Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory. Chicago, pp. 152–167.

  14. Musolff Andreas. 2019. Creativity in Metaphor Interpretation. Russian Journal of Linguistics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 23–39.