eLIBRARY ID: 8377
ISSN: 2074-1588

eLIBRARY ID: 8377
ISSN: 2074-1588

En Ru
Prosody in the oral and written language forms interaction

Prosody in the oral and written language forms interaction

Recieved: 02/16/2025

Accepted: 03/22/2025

Published: 06/17/2025

Keywords: discourse, speaker’s strategy, oral-written hybridization, transcription, prosody, pausal segmentation, terminal contour, fundamental frequency (F0), pitch range

DOI Number: 10.55959/MSU-2074-1588-19-28-2-3

Available online: 10.09.2025

To cite this article

Bubnova G.I. Prosody in the oral and written language forms interaction. // Moscow University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication 2025. Vol. 28. Issue 2. 39-58 https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU-2074-1588-19-28-2-3.

Issue 2, 2025

Abstract

Modern literate individuals exist, speak, and write in an environment where oral and written language forms constantly interact, a topic extensively covered in linguistic literature.

The aim of this study is to explore the functioning of the prosodic component in the discursive interaction of these two materially distinct forms, each possessing its own cognitive mechanism for meaning production and specific ways of its encoding.

The objective of the article is to identify and describe the prosodic means used by speakers during the oral and written channels interaction. The experimental research is based on a French radio broadcast discussing a current social issue with professionals who have publications and public speeches on the topic. It is reasonable to assume that generated in this context oral speech can be considered a kind of oral-written hybridization. According to our hypothesis, prosodic means play a significant role in this process, operating at both perceptual (continuous) and linguistic (discrete) levels of representation, thus possessing cognitive status.

The results of the study can be applied in foreign language teaching practices.

References

  1. Bubnova G.I. 1998. Osnovnye intonatsionnye kontury: akusticheskaya forma i funktsii, vypolnyaemye v ustnoporozhdaemoi rechi (na materiale frantsuzskogo yazyka) [Basic intonation contours: acoustic form and functions realised in oral speech production]. Coll. of scientifi c papers “Experimental studies of oral speech production”. Moscow. Institute of Linguistics RA, pp. 3–28. (In Russ.)

  2. Bubnova G.I. 2000. Kanal porozhdeniya rechi kak komponent kognitivnoj strategii / Eksperimentalnye issledovaniya ustnoj rechi i ovladeniya yazykom [Speech production channel as a component of cognitive strategy]. Coll. of scientific papers “Experimental studies of oral speech and language acquisition”. Moscow. Institute of Linguistics RAS, pp. 3–32. (In Russ.)

  3. Bubnova G.I. 2018. Lingvokognitivnaya specifi ka monologicheskoi rechi v usloviyah ozvuchivaniya i spontannogo porojdeniya _na materiale francuzskoi radioperedachi “La Danse des mots” [Linguo-cognitive Specifi city of Monologue Speech under Conditions of Scripted and Spontaneous Production: A Study of the French Radio Broadcast “La Danse des mots”]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 2, pp. 31–41. (In Russ.)

  4. Bubnova G.I. 2021. Pertseptivno-slukhovaya segmentatsiya ustno porozhdaemoi rechi [Perceptual-aural segmentation of oral speech]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 3, pp. 51–64. (In Russ.)

  5. Bubnova G.I., Gladkikh M.V. 2018. Prosodya obrashennosti [Prosody of the addressing]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 3, pp. 46–57. (In Russ.)

  6. Gasparov B.M. 1978. Ustnaya rech kak semioticheskij obekt [Oral speech as a semiotic object]. Uchen. zap. Tartusskogo gos. un-ta. Tartu, Vyp. 442. URL: https://www.ruthenia.ru/folklore/gasparov1.htm (accessed: 20.01.2025). (In Russ.)

  7. Dzhaparidze Z.N., Strelnikov Yu.A. 1984. O razlichiyah v plache novorozhdennyh raznoj nacionalnosti i pola (k probleme urovnej foneticheskoj organizacii chlenorazdelnoj rechi) [On the differences in crying of newborns of different nationalities and genders (to the problem of levels of phonetic organization of articulate speech)]. Vyp. 1. LGU, pp. 58–64. (In Russ.)

  8. Zemskaya E.A. 1978. Osobennosti russkoj razgovornoj rechi i struktura kommunikativnogo akta [Features of Russian colloquial speech and the structure of the communicative act]. Slavyanskoe yazykoznanie. VIII mezhdunarodnyj sezd slavistov. Moskva: Nauka, pp. 196–220. (In Russ.)

  9. Kazanovich Ya.B. 2018. Ostsillyatornye neirosetevye modeli kognitivnykh funktsii mozga. [Oscillatory neural network models of brain cognitive functions.]. AVTOREFERAT dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni doktora fiziko-matematicheskikh nauk. Pushchino. URL: https://rusneb.ru/catalog/000199_000009_008709131/ (accessed: 1.06.2023). (In Russ.)

  10. Kibrik A.A. 2008. Est li predlozhenie v ustnoj rechi? [Is there a sentence in oral speech?]. In A.V. Arhipova i dr. (ed.). Fonetika i nefonetika. M.: YaSL, pp. 104–115. (In Russ.)

  11. Kibrik A.A., Podlesskaya V.I. 2003. K sozdaniyu korpusov ustnoj russkoj rechi: principy transkribirovaniya [Towards the creation of corpora of oral Russian speech: principles of transcription]. Nauchno-tehnicheskaya informaciya. Seriya 2, 6, pp. 5–11. (In Russ.)

  12. Kibrik A.A. 2010. Multimodalnaya lingvistika [Multimodal linguistics]. Kognitivnye issledovaniya. Sbornik nauchnyh trudov. Vypusk 4. Moskva, Izdatelstvo: Institut psihologii RAN, pp. 135–152.

  13. NigmatulinaYu.O., Palchikov G.G., Riehakajnen E.I. 2014. Pauzaciya i sintaksicheskie svyazi v russkoj spontannoj rechi [Pausing and syntactic connections in Russian spontaneous speech]. URL: https://pureportal.spbu.ru/en/publications/-------(f56670af-a449-4543-9c91-e2c703e1c1c0).html (accessed: 20.01.2025). (In Russ.)

  14. Rуko A.I., Stepanova S.B. 2009. Strategii chleneniya spontannoi rechi na sintaksicheskie edinici [Strategies for dividing spontaneous speech into syntactic units]. URL: http://www.dialog-21.ru/digests/dialog2009/materials/html/68.htm#_ftn3 (accessed 20.01.2025). (In Russ.)

  15. Blanche-Benveniste Cl., Bilger M. 1999. Francais parle-oral spontane. Quelques refl exions [Spoken French-spontaneous oral. Some refl ections]. Revue francaise de linguistique appliquee, vol. IV-2, pp. 21–30. (In French)

  16. Dehaene S. 2018. Interview dans la librairie Mollat a Bordeaux [Interview in the Mollat bookstore in Bordeaux]. URL: https://www.mollat.com/evenements/rencontre-avec-stanislas-dehaene (consulte le 20.01.2025). (In French)

  17. Delattre P. 1966. Les dix intonations de base du francais. [Ten basic intonations of French]. Th e French Review, t. 40, pp. 67–211. (In French)

  18. Fonagy I. 1989. Le francais change de visage? [Is French changing its face?]. Revue romane, 24–2, pp. 225–254. URL: https://tidsskrift.dk/revue_romane/article/view/29677/26966 (consulte le 20.01.2025). (In French)

  19. Giraud A.L., Poeppel D. 2012. Cortical oscillations and speech processing: emerging computational principles and operations. Nature neuroscience, vol. 15. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4769593/ (accessed: 20.01.2025). (In French)

  20. Grosjean F., Collins M. 1979. Breathing, Pausing and Reading. Phonetica, 36, pp. 98–114.

  21. Guiraud Н. 2017. Symphonie des oscillations cerebrales lors de la perception de parole : Etudes comportementale et en magnetoencephalographie chez les enfants neurotypiques et dysphasiques [Symphony of brain oscillations during speech perception: Behavioral and magnetoencephalography studies in neurotypical and dysphasic children]. These рresentee en vue de l’obtention du grade de DOCTEUR EN PSYCHOLOGIE DE L’UNIVERSITE DE LYON. Discipline: Sciences Cognitives mention Linguistique. URL: http://www.ddl.cnrs.fr/fulltext/Guiraud/Guiraud_2017_These.pdf (consulte le 20.01.2025). (In French)

  22. Hansen A.B. 1997. Le nouveau [ə] prepausal dans le francais parle a Paris [The new prepausal [ə] in French spoken in Paris]. Polyphonie pour Ivan Fonagy, Paris: L’Harmattan, pp. 173–198. (In French)

  23. Leon P.R. 1992. Phonetisme et prononciations du francais [Phonetics and pronunciations of French]. Paris: Nathan. (In French)

  24. Lucci V. 1980. L’accent didactiqu e [Th e didactic ac cent]. L’Accent en Francais Contemporain. In I. Fonagy, P.R. Leon (eds). Studia phonetica, 15, pp. 107–121. (In French)

  25. Mampe B., Friederici A.D., Christophe A., Wermke K. 2009. Newborns’ Cry Melody Is Shaped by Their Native Language. Current Biology. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.09.064. URL: https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(09)01824-7 (accessed: 20.01.2025)

  26. Martin Ph. 2014. Ondes cerebrales et contraintes de la structure prosodique [Brain waves and constraints of prosodic structure]. Synergies Europe, no. 9, pp. 161–176. (In French)

  27. Martin Ph. 2013. La structure prosodique opere-t-elle avant ou apres la syntaxe ? [Does prosodic structure operate before or aft er syntax?]. TIPA. Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage [En linea], no. 29. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/tipa/943 ; DOI : 10.4000/tipa.943 (consulte le 20.01.2025). (In French)

  28. Peytard J. 1981. Pour une typologie des messages oraux [For a typology of oral messages]. La grammaire du francais parle, Paris: Hachette, pp. 161–176. (In French)

  29. Poeppel D. 2003. Th e analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: cerebral lateralization as ‘asymmetric sampling in time’. Speech Communication, 41: 1, pp. 245–255. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00107-3 (accessed: 20.01.2025).