Rendering the functional potential of vertical context elements in simultaneous interpreting

Abstract

Political media discourse accumulates and creates its own unique field of various vertical context elements, whose connotations, associations and meanings are determined by the communicative situation. The present study is undertaken to explore the functional potential of vertical context elements and examine the impact of its rendition on the quality of simultaneous interpretation. The main functions of vertical context elements in political media discourse prove to be ideological, self-presenting/image-forming and culture-identifying. Being aware of the functional potential of vertical context elements, used in speech not sporadically, but to achieve a specific communicative goal, is crucial to the choice of the appropriate interpreting strategy encompassing relevant techniques for its implementation. The findings further reveal that vertical context elements are characterized by multifunctionality. Moreover, the combination of these functions embodies the communicative intention of the speaker. From the perspective of simultaneous interpreting practice, it seems to be a prerequisite to aspire to determine and render the prevailing function. In political media discourse, the function instrumental in preserving the communicative effect of the source utterance seems to be the ideological one, manifesting itself in its two key varieties, namely manipulative and discrediting. The present research identifies the following extralinguistic factors that impede the proper rendition of the functional potential of vertical context elements: fast or situation-adjusted acceleration of the speaker’s speech rate, excessive redundancy of the source speech, inefficient allocation of attention resources and the mode of simultaneous interpreting..

References

1. Bazylev V.N. 2005. Lingvisticheskaya personologiya: Irina Hakamada (k opredeleniyu statusa discipliny) [Linguistic Personology: Irina Khakamada (towards defining the status of the discipline)]. Izvestiya Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Lingvistika, no. 15, pp. 163–167. (In Russ.)

2. Gudkov D.B. 2003. Teoriya i praktika mezhkul’turnoj kommunikacii [Theory and practice of intercultural communication]. M.: ITDGK “Gnozis”. (In Russ.)

3. Gjubbenet I.V. 2010. Osnovy filologicheskoi interpretatsii literaturno-khudozhestvennogo teksta [The basic principles of philological interpretation of a literary text]. 2nd edition. Moscow, Knizhniy dom “LIBROKOM”. (In Russ.)

4. Mikhaylovskaya M.V. 2016. K postanovke voprosa o global’nom vertikal’nom kontekste diskursa i ego peredache v ustnom perevode [On the global vertical context of discourse in interpreting]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 4, pp. 174–181. ( In Russ.)

5. Mikhailovskaia M.V. 2018. Ustnyj perevod: ideologema kak kategorija global’nogo vertikal’nogo konteksta [An ideologically-bound unit as a global vertical context category from the perspective of interpreting practice]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 4, pp. 167–175. (In Russ.)

6. Polubichenko L.V. 1979. K obosnovaniyu I razvitiyu ponatiya vertikal’nyi filologicheskii kontekst: Diss. … kand. filol. nauk [Concerning the development and reasoning of the concept of philological vertical context]. Moscow. (In Russ.)

7. Polubichenko L.V., Mikhaylovskaya M.V. 2017. Ustniy perevod v diskursivnom aspekte: globalniy vertikalniy context [Discursive approach to interpreting: global vertical context]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 1, pp. 116–129. ( In Russ.)

8. Gile D. 1999. Testing the Effort Models’ tightrope hypothesis in simultaneous interpreting — a contribution. Hermes: Journal of Linguistics, no. 23, pp. 153–172.