eLIBRARY ID: 8377
ISSN: 2074-1588

eLIBRARY ID: 8377
ISSN: 2074-1588

En Ru
Translation strategies related to the omission of verbs when translating from Russian into French

Translation strategies related to the omission of verbs when translating from Russian into French

Recieved: 06/08/2023

Accepted: 02/01/2024

Published: 06/30/2024

Keywords: translation transformations; translation techniques; omission; verb; redundancy

DOI Number: 10.55959/MSU-2074-1588-19-27-2-13

Available online: 28.06.2024

To cite this article

Darovskikh Yu.A. Translation strategies related to the omission of verbs when translating from Russian into French. // Moscow University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication 2024. Issue 2. 164-173 https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU-2074-1588-19-27-2-13.

Issue 2, 2024

Abstract

While there is a vast literature on translation transformations and techniques, little attention among Russian researchers is paid to the omission. The article attempts to contribute to the debate by analyzing the omission as a translation technique, as well as verb omission examples when translating a literary text from Russian into French. The omission means elimination of a source text (ST) element while translating into target text. The omission can occur at the semantic or structural-semantic levels. The latter implies not only semantic but also syntactic changes. The omission can be due to the redundancy of an element in the ST. Redundancy in ST can be caused by the structural features of the source language, repetition of information in the text or by the opportunity to extract information from the situational context. The analysis of examples of verb omission taken from the translations into French of the novel Oblomov written by Ivan Goncharov showed that the use of this technique in relation to Russian verbs obeys the general patterns of the use of omission listed above: a French translator can omit a verb and use a more economical construction allowed by the norms of the French language; can translate one verb from two ST verbs with the same meaning; can eliminate the original verb if it’s meaning can be derived from the situational context. However, the original verb can convey stylistic meanings that are important in the work; if this verb is omitted, stylistic meanings disappear.

References

  1. Barkhudarov L.S. 1975. Yazyk i perevod (Voprosy obshchei i chastnoi teorii perevoda) [Language and translation. Questions of general and particular theory of translation]. Moscow, Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [International relations], (In Russ.)

  2. Gak V.G. 1998. Yazykovye preobrazovaniya [Language transformation]. Moscow, Shkola “Yazyki russkoi kul’tury” [School “Languages of Russian Culture”] (In Russ.)

  3. Zav’yalova Yu.A. 2019. Funktsionirovanie transformatsii pri perevode zagolovkov nemetskoyazychnykh statei onlain-resursa deutschland.de na russkii yazyk. [Functional transformations when translating titles of German articles from the site deutschland.de into Russian]. Litera [Litera], no. 2, pp. 1–5. (In Russ.)

  4. Izvolenskaya A.S. 2020. “The catcher in the rye”: golos, poteryanny`j v perevode [“The catcher in the rye”: the voice lost in translation]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 1, pp. 9–18. (In Russ.)

  5. Inozemtseva N.V. 2017. Transformatsii pri perevode zagolovkov angloyazychnykh statei metodicheskogo soderzhaniya [Transformations when translating titles of English methodical articles]. Vestnik OGU [The Vestnik OSU], no. 7, 202, pp. 76–80. (In Russ.)

  6. Kazakov A.V., Nadeeva E.Yu. 2021. Osobennosti opushcheniya kak perevodcheskoi transformatsii na materiale stat’i another reality: the creative gift and the spiritual sense [Features of omission as a translation transformation (based on the article stat’i another reality: the creative gift and the spiritual sense]. Vestnik VyatGU [The Vestnik Vyatsu], pp. 187–191. (In Russ.).

  7. Komissarov V.N. 1990. Teoriya perevoda (lingvisticheskie aspekty) [Theory of Translation (Linguistic aspects)]. Moscow, Vysshaja shkola [Vysshaya shkola]. (In Russ.)

  8. Erdyneeva Ch.V. 2011. Tekhnicheskie priemy perevoda: peremeshchenie, dobavlenie i opushchenie leksicheskikh edinits [Translations techniques: transposition, addition and omission of lexical items]. Vestnik BGU [The BSU Bulletin], pp. 149–154. (In Russ.)

  9. Proshina Z.G. 2023. Mezhvariantny`j perevod i ego integraciya v programmu podgotovki perevodchikov. [Intervarietal translation and its itegration into translating curricula]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 3, pp. 108–120. (In Russ.)

  10. Khuukhuni G.T., Osipova Anna A. 2021. Referenciya ili pragmatika? (o vozmozhny`x strategiyax perevodov Biblii). [Reference or pragmatics (about possible strategies of bible translations)]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 2, pp. 215–224. (In Russ.)

  11. Yanova E.A., Kaziakhmedova S.Kh., Ibragimova Z.A. 2016. Priem opushcheniya kak odin iz effektivnykh sposobov kompressii dlya ustraneniya semanticheskoi izbytochnosti pri perevode s angliiskogo yazyka na russkii yazyk [Omission as one of the efficient compression techniques for translation of semantically redundant words]. Kul’tura i tsivilizatsiya [Culture and civilization], no. 1, pp. 303–317. (In Russ.)

  12. Trésor de la langue française informatisé. URL: http://atilf.atilf.fr/tlf.htm (accessed: 19.10.2021)