Prosody of the Addressing in French Political Speech

Abstract

Political speech (hereinafter PS) is a monological public speech of a political figure, which relies on a written text, the informative component of which is created at the lexico-grammatical level by the speechwriter, and the task of the politician is to ensure that the information is adequately understood by the listening audience. One way of doing this is to reduce the distance between the speaker and the audience. To achieve this “understanding”, the speaker uses the opportunities provided by the oral channel of communication both at the verbal level — the means of phonetic expression that create the prosody of the address — and at the non-verbal level — from body posture to gestures and eye expressions. In linguistics and psycholinguistics the synergetic interaction between prosody and kinesics is increasingly discussed today. How is this interaction realised in PS and what is its effectiveness? Is it possible to consider the realised PS as a multimodal speech utterance? In order to answer these questions this article examines the current approaches to the study of French PS presented in corpus linguistics [Goldman et al., 2009; Simon et al., 2010, 2013] and interdisciplinary linguistics [Kibrik, 2018; Guaitella, 2014] and discusses the relevance of their results to describe the prosody of address as a strategic component of PS.

References

1. Belikov A.P. 1991. Funktsional’noe vzaimodeistvie rechi i zhesta: instrumental’noe issledovanie [Functional interaction between speech and gesture: an instrumental study]. Мoscow. URL: https://cheloveknauka.com/funktsionalnoe-vzaimodeystvierechi-i-zhesta (accessed: 25.05.2023). (In Russ.)

2. Bubnova G.I. 1998. Osnovnye intonatsionnye kontury: akusticheskaya forma i funktsii, vypolnyaemye v ustnoporozhdaemoi rechi (na materiale frantsuzskogo yazyka) [Basic intonation contours: acoustic form and functions realised in oral speech production]. Coll. of scientific papers “Experimental studies of oral speech production”. pp. 3–28. (In Russ.)

3. Bubnova G.I., Gladkikh M.V. 2018. Prosodiya obrashchennosti [Prosody of the addressing]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, № 3, pp. 46–57. (In Russ.)

4. Bubnova G.I. 2020. Lingvo-kognitivnye strategii, opredelyayushchie transformatsii pis’mennogo teksta v situatsii chteniya i govoreniya [Linguistic and cognitive strategies that determine the transformation of written text in reading and speaking situations]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, № 4, pp. 9–19. (In Russ.)

5. Bubnova G.I. 2021. Pertseptivno-slukhovaya segmentatsiya ustno porozhdaemoi rechi [Perceptual-aural segmentation of oral speech]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, № 3, pp. 51–64. (In Russ.)

6. Gal’perin I.R. 2007. Tekst kak ob”ekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya [Text as an Object of Linguistic Research]. Moscow, KomKniga. (In Russ.)

7. Danilova N.N. 2006. Rol’ vysokochastotnykh ritmov elektricheskoi aktivnosti mozga v obespechenii psikhicheskikh protsessov [The role of high-frequency rhythms of brain electrical activity in providing psychic processes]. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 62–72. URL: https://psy-journal.hse.ru/data/2011/04/26/1210584340/62-72.pdf (accessed: 1.06.2023). (In Russ.)

8. Kazanovich Ya. B. 2018. Ostsillyatornye neirosetevye modeli kognitivnykh funktsii mozga. [Oscillatory neural network models of brain cognitive functions.] AVTOREFERAT dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni doktora fizikomatemat icheskikh nauk. Pushchino. URL: ht tps: //rusneb.ru/catalog/000199_000009_008709131/ (accessed: 1.06.2023). (In Russ.)

9. Kibrik A.A. 2018. Russkii mul’tikanal’nyi diskurs. Chast’ I. Postanovka problem [Russian multimodal discourse. Part I. Statement of the problem]. Psychological Journal, 39(1), pp. 70–80. URL: https://multidiscourse.ru/data/pub/kibrik_psy_journal_1_2018.pdf (accessed: 1.06.2023). (In Russ.)

10. Morozov V.P. 2011. Neverbal’naya kommunikatsiya: Eksperimental’no-psi khologicheskie issledovaniya [Nonverbal Communication: Experimental Psychological Research]. Moscow, Izd-vo ≪Institut psikhologii RAN≫. (In Russ.)

11. Andre F., Hirsch F., Bechet M., Defradas M., Didirkova I., Maturafi L., Elodie B. 2014. La pause: un parametre variable dans le discours politique. SHS Web of Conferences, vol. 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20140801354 (accessed: 10.05.2023). (In French)

12. Avanzi M., Simon A.C., Goldman J.P., Auchlin A. 2010. C-PROM: Un corpus de franc ais parle annote pour l’e tude des proe minences [A corpus of annotated spoken French for the study of prominences]. In Proceedings of JEP. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236971668_C-PROM_Un_corpus_de_francais_parle_annote_pour_l%... (accessed: 02.06.2023). (In French)

13. Bardiaux A. 2010. Comment parlent les hommes politiques ? Analyse prosodique de la parole politique publique : de la variation stylistique a la variation individuelle [How do politicians speak? Prosodic analysis of public political speech: from stylistic variation to individual variation]. Recherches en Communication, vol. 32, issue 32, pp. 207–223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14428/rec.v32i32.51763 (accessed: 02.06.2023). (In French)

14. Bechet M., Sandre M., Hirsch F., Richard A., Marsac F. et al. 2013. De l’utilisation de la pause silencieuse dans le debat politique televise. Le cas de Francois Hollande [On the use of the silent pause in the televised political debate. The case of Francois Hollande]. Mots. Les langages du politique, vol.103, pp. 23–38. URL: https://journals.openedition.org/mots/21460 (accessed: 02.06.2023). (In French)

15. Dehaene S. 2018. Apprendre ! Les talents du cerveau, le de fi des machines [Learning! The talents of the brain, the challenge of machines]. Paris, Odile Jacob. (In French)

16. Delattre P. 1966. Les dix intonations de base du francais. [Ten basic intonations of French]. The French Review, T. 40, pp. 67–211. (In French)

17. Duez D. 2003. Le pouvoir du silence et le silence du pouvoir : comment interpre ter le discours politique [The power of silence and the silence of power: interpreting political discourse]. MediaMorphoses, no. 8, pp. 77–82. URL: http://www2.lpl-aix.fr/~fulltext/1619.pdf (accessed: 02.06.2023). (In French)

18. Eskenazi M. 1993. Trends in Speaking Styles Research. Proceedings Eurospeech’93, vol. 2, pp. 501–509. (In French)

19. Fontolan L. 2015. Encoding speech through brain rhythms: a computational model of auditory cortex. THESE Presentee a la Faculte des Sciences de l’Universite de Geneve pour obtenir le grade de Docteur en Neuroscience. Universite de Geneve. URL: https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/files/downloads/0/0/1/2/4/1/0/9/unige_124109_attachment01.pdf (accessed: 02.06.2023)

20. Guiraud Н. 2017. Symphonie des oscillations cerebrales lors de la perception de parole : Etudes comportementale et en magnetoencephalographie chez les enfants neurotypiques et dysphasiques [Symphony of brain oscillations during speech perception: Behavioral and magnetoencephalography studies in neurotypical and dysphasic children]. These рresentee en vue de l’obtention du grade de DOCTEUR EN PSYCHOLOGIE DE L’UNIVERSITE DE LYON. Discipline: Sciences Cognitives mention Linguistique. URL: http://www.ddl.cnrs.fr/fulltext/Guiraud/Guiraud_2017_These.pdf (accessed: 03.06.2023). (In French).

21. Giraud, A.L., Poeppel D. 2012. Cortical oscillations and speech processing: emerging computational principles and operations. Nature neuroscience, vol. 15. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4769593/ (accessed: 01.06.2023)

22. Goldman, J.P., Auchlin, A., Simon, A.C. 2009. Discrimination de styles de parole par analyse prosodique semi-automatique [Discrimination of speech styles by semi-automatic prosodic analysis]. In Actes d’IDP, pp. 207–221. URL: https://dial.uclouvain.be/pr/boreal/object/boreal:110706 (accessed: 02.06.2023). (In French)

23. Guai tella I. 1991. Comparaison critique du rythme de la lecture oralise e et de la parole spontane e [Critical comparison of the rhythm of oralized reading and spontaneous speech]. The se de Doctorat, Aix-en-Provence, Universite de Provence. (In French)

24. Guai tella I. 1995. Me lodie du geste, mimique vocale ? [Melody of gesture, vocal mimicry?] Semiotica, vol. 103, no. 3-4, pp. 253–76.

25. Guai tella I. 2014. Proe minences et e minences : savoir-faire discursif, faillances et de faillances des hommes politiques [Prosodic and gestural prominences in political discourse : emphasis, focalization and politicians’ abilities]. TIPA. Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage, vol. 30. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/tipa/1248 (accessed: 02.05.2023). (In French)

26. Hyafil A., Fontolan L., Kabdebon C., Gutkin B., Giraud A.L. 2015. Speech encoding by coupled cortical theta and gamma oscillations. eLife, vol. 4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06213.001. (accessed: 02.06.2023)

27. Hirsch F., Marsac F., Didirkova I., Bechet M. et al. 2016. Spe cificite s du rythme de la parole politique. Le cas de Franc ois Hollande [Specificities of the rhythm of political speech. The case of Francois Hollande]. Romanica Wratislaviensia, no. 63., pp. 145–155. URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02289512 (accessed: 02.06.2023). (In French)

28. Koch P., Oesterreicher W. 2001. Langage parle et langage e crit [Spoken and written language]. Tu bingen, Max Niemeyer. pp. 584–627. (In French)

29. Labov W. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania Press.

30. Leon P. 1993. Precis de phonostylistique, Parole et expressivite [Phonostylistics review, Speech and Expressivity]. Paris, Nathan Universite. (In French)

31. Lieury A., Leger L. 2020. Introduction a la psychologie cognitive [Introduction to cognitive psychology]. Paris, Dunod. (In French)

32. Poeppel D. 2003. The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: cerebral lateralization as “asymmetric sampling in time”. Speech Commun, 41, pp. 245–255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00107-3 (accessed: 03.06.2023).

33. Simon A.C., Auchlin A., Avanzi M., Goldman J.P. 2010. Les phonostyles: une description prosodique des styles de parole en francais [Phonostyles: a prosodic description of speech styles in French]. In: Abecassi, M. & G. Ledegen, Les voix des Francais. En parlant, en ecrivant. Berne. Peter Lang. URL: https://www.unine.ch/files/live/sites/structuration_periodes/files/shared/new_am/simon_.pdf (accessed: 02.06.2023). (In French)

34. Simon A.C., Auchlin A., Goldman J.P. & Christodoulides G. 2013. Tendances prosodiques de la parole radiophonique [Prosodic trends in radio speech]. Cahiers de praxematique, no. 61. DOI: 10.4000/praxematique.1899 (accessed: 02.06.2023). (In French)