The Place of Non-syntactic Grammatical Meanings in F. Fortunatov’s Theory on the Grammatical Forms of Words and A. Potebnya’s Theory on the Inner Form of the Word

Abstract

The article attempts to establish a connection between the linguistic theories of F.F. Fortunatov and A.A. Potebnya. It is known that in nouns that name people and animals important to humans, the grammatical meanings of gender indicate their biological sex. As for the nouns that name inanimate objects, as well as some other animals, their grammatical meanings of gender for quite a long time were estimated by linguists as relics of an ancient form of thinking incomprehensible to modern people. However, if we consider the grammatical meanings of gender as a component of the inner form of the word, it becomes clear that when creating words, the meanings of the masculine gender were used to indicate the presence of such properties in objects that are inherent in male beings, such as their relatively greater activity, larger size, greater strength and greater independence. In turn, feminine grammatical meanings reflected the absence of these properties. The article emphasizes the similarity between the grammatical meanings of gender of nouns and the inner forms of words in their traditional lexicological understanding: (1) in different languages, the names of the same objects can have different grammatical gender meanings, (2) at the time of the appearance of a word, its inner form indicate the connection between the word and its lexical meaning, but over time inner forms can be obscured or lost, (3) like the traditional inner forms, the grammatical meanings of gender can either represent one of the components of the lexical meaning of the word, or may be part of its connotations.

References

1. Alpatov V.M. 1998. Istoriya lingvisticheskikh uchenii [The History of Linguistic Doctrines]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoi kul’tury. (In Russ.)

2. Apresyan Yu.D. 1995. Izbrannye trudy [Selected Writings]. Vol. 2. Moscow, Shkola Yazyki russkoi kul’tury. (In Russ.)

3. Bogatyreva O.L. 2008. Kreativnyi potentsial kategorii roda v sovremennom russkom yazyke [The Creative Potential of the Gender Category in Modern Russian]. Abstract dis. … cand. philol. sciences. Moscow. (In Russ.)

4. Vinogradov V.V. 1972. Russkii Yazyk (Grammaticheskoe Uchenie o Slove) [Russian Language (Grammatical Doctrine of the Word)]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola. (In Russ.)

5. Graudina L.K., Itskovich V.A., Katlinskaya L.P. 1976. Grammaticheskaya pravil’nost’ russkoi rechi: Opyt chastotno-stilisticheskogo slovarya variantov [Grammatical Correctness of Russian Speech: An Experience of a Frequency-Stylistic Dictionary of Variants]. Moscow, Nauka. (In Russ.)

6. Humboldt W. von. 1984. Izbrannye trudy po yazvkoznaniyu [Selected Works on Linguistics]. Moscow, Progress. (In Russ.)

7. Hjelmslev L. 1999. Prolegomeny k teorii yazyka [Prolegomena to the Theory of Language]. Zarubezhnaya lingvistika. I [Foreign Linguistics. I]. Moscow, Progress, pp. 131–256. (In Russ.)

8. Zaliznyak Anna A. 2005. Problema vnutrennei formy slova v tipologicheskom aspekte [The Problem of the Inner Form of a Word in the Typological Aspect]. Yazyk. Lichnost’. Tekst: Sbornik statei k 70 letiyu T.M. Nikolaevoi [Language. Personality. Text: Collection of Articles Dedicated to the 70th Anniversary of T.M. Nikolaeva]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskikh kul’tur, pp. 87–106. (In Russ.)

9. Isachenko A.V. 2003. Grammaticheskii stroi russkogo yazyka v sopostavlenii so slovatskim: Morfologiya [The Grammatical Structure of the Russian Language in Comparison with Slovak: Morphology]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury.

10. Shvedova N.Yu, Lopatin V.V. (eds.) 1989. Kratkaya russkaya grammatika [Brief Russian Grammar]. Moscow, Russkii yazyk. (In Russ.)

11. Lopatin V.V. 2020. Grammaticheskoe znachenie [The Grammatical Meaning] Russkii yazyk: Ehntsiklopediya [Russian language: Encyclopedia]. Moscow, AST-Press Shkola, pp. 122–123. (In Russ.)

12. Mel’nikov G.P. 2003. Sistemnaya tipologiya yazykov [System Typology of Languages]. Moscow, Nauka. (In Russ.)

13. Norman B.Yu. 2022. Entimologicheskii slovar’ [Entymological Dictionary]. Moscow, Flinta. (In Russ.)

14. Peshkovskii A.M. 2001. Russkii sintaksis v nauchnom osveshchenii [Russian Syntax in Scientific Coverage]. URSS. (In Russ.)

15. Potebnya A.A. 1993. Mysl’ i yazyk [Thought and Language]. Kiev, SINTO. (In Russ.)

16. Remchukova E.N. 2005. Kreativnyi potentsial russkoi grammatiki [Creative Potential of Russian Grammar]. Moscow, RUDN. (In Russ.)

17. Rozental’ D.E., Dzhandzhakova E.V., Kabanova N.P. 1998. Spravochnik po pravopisaniyu, proiznosheniyu, literaturnomu redaktirovaniyu [A Guide to Spelling, Pronunciation, Literary Editing]. Moscow, ChERo.

18. Stepanov Yu.S. 1975. Osnovy obshchego yazykoznaniya [Basics of general linguistics]. Moscow, Prosveshchenie. (In Russ.)

19. Fedosyuk M.Yu. 2016. Jeep podrezal forda, ili Sushchestvuet li v russkom yazyke grammaticheskaya kategoriya odushevlennosti / neodushevlennosti? [Jeep cut forda, or Is there a grammatical category of animateness / inanimateness in Russian?]. Studia z Filologii Polskiej i Słowianskiej, vol. 51, pp. 73–88.

20. Fedosyuk M.Yu. 2019. Na loshadi ili na kone sidit Mednyi vsadnik? (O vklade grammaticheskoi kategorii roda v leksicheskie znacheniya sushchestvitel’nykh) [On the contribution of the grammatical category of gender to the lexical meanings of nouns]. Slavia Orientalis, 2019, vol. LXVIII, No. 1, pp. 137–148.

21. Fedosyuk M.Yu. 2022. O prichinakh rosta analitizma i produktivnosti neidiomatichnykh nominatsii v russkom yazyke nashikh dnei [On the Reasons for the Growth of Analyticism and Productivity of Non-idiomatic Nominations in the Russian Language of Our Days. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 4, pp. 9–19. (In Russ.)

22. Fedosyuk M.Yu. 2023. Psikhologicheskii aspekt lingvisticheskoi kontseptsii L.V. Shcherby [The Psychological Aspect of the Linguistic Concept of L.V. Shcherba]. Psikhologiya yazyka i psikholingvistika: istoki i sovremennost’ (k 200-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya Kheimana Shteintalya). [Psychology of Language and Psycholinguistics: Origins and Modernity (on the 200th Anniversary of the Birth of Heymann Steinthal)]. Moscow, RIO GUP, pp. 179–186.

23. Fortunatov F.F. 1956–1957. Izbrannye trudy [Selected Writings], Vol. 1, Moscow, Uchpedgiz, (In Russ.) Tom 2. M.: Uchpedgiz, 1957.

24. Shevliakova D.A. 2023. Printsipy nominatsii ital’yanskikh vin v nachale XXI v. [Principles of naming Italian wines in the 21st century]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 2, pp. 68–78. (In Russ.)

25. Steinthal H. 1964. Grammatika, logika i psikhologiya (ikh printsipy i ikh vzaimootnosheniya) [Grammar, Logic and Psychology (Their Principles and Their Relationships)] In Zvegintsev V.A. Istoriya yazykoznaniya XIX–XX vekov v ocherkakh i izvlecheniyakh [History of Linguistics of the 19th–20th Centuries in Essays and Extracts]. Part 1. Moscow, Prosveshchenie, pp. 127–135. (In Russ.)

26. Shcherba L.V. 1974.Yazykovaya sistema i rechevaya deyatel’nost’ [Language System and Speech Activity]. Leningrad, Nauka. (In Russ.)