The Problem of the Commemorative Function of Eponymous Terms in Clinical Neurosciences

Abstract

Eponymous terminology plays an important role in medicine: it is impossible to imagine an area of study in which there would not be used compound terms with an onomastic component or common nouns derived from onyms. Nevertheless, there is an ambiguous attitude towards eponymous terms in the scientific community. From the point of view of displaying linguistic and cultural-historical information, the most important function which is realized in the eponymous terms with an anthroponomic core is the commemorative function. The aim of this study is to analyze the commemorative function of the eponymous terms of clinical neurosciences (neurology and psychiatry). Practical material is taken from MedicineNet.com. During the study, using the method of continuous sampling, 155 eponymous terms were selected. The study made it possible to identify the following problems of the current state of the terminological system of neurology and psychiatry: the use of patients’ surnames as an eponymous component of the term along with the surnames of doctors; inaccuracy of information about the history of the study of diseases associated with the perpetuation in terms of the names of doctors who are not pioneers; the presence in the terminology of negatively colored onyms associated with the ideologists and accomplices of Nazism.

References

1. Garanin A.A., Garanina M.R. 2019. O meste eponimov v sovremennoi meditsinskoi terminologii [The place of eponyms in the contemporary medical terminology] // Voprosy onomastiki. № 3 (16), pp. 110–124. (In Russ).

2. Glinskaya N.P., Cherezova T.L. 2019. Sovremennaya meditsinskaya terminologiya v svete globalizatsii [Contemporary medical terminology in view of globalization] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 19. Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya. no. 3, pp. 28–33. (In Russ).

3. Damulin I.V. 2017. Svyazannye s natsizmom eponimy v neironaukakh [Eponyms connected with Nazism in neurosciences] // Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii. no. 2, pp. 174–177. (In Russ).

4. Izvekova T.F., Grishchenko E.V., Purtov A.S. 2014. Eponimy v meditsinskoi terminologii [Eponyms in medical terminology] // Journal of Siberian Medical Sciences. no. 3. URL: https://mos.ngmu.ru/article/text_full.php?id=1365 (accessed: 16.01.2023). (In Russ).

5. Kakzanova E.M. 2019. Anatomicheskaya nomenklatura VS klinicheskaya terminologiya — net li zdes’ nesootvetstviya? [Anatomical nomenclature of the VS clinical terminology — is there a discrepancy here?] // Prepodavanie klassicheskikh yazykov v epokhu global’noi informatizatsii. pp. 28–35. (In Russ).

6. Kakzanova E.M. 2015. Imja sobstvennoe v termine [Proper name in terminology] M., «Galleja-Print», (In Russ).

7. Kovalenko A.S. 2022. Osobennosti vliyaniya lingvokul’turnogo konteksta na terminologicheskie modeli v klinicheskikh neironaukakh [Influence of linguocultural context on terminological models in clinical neurosciences] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 19. Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya. no. 2, pp. 79–85. (In Russ).

8. Lotte D.S. 1961. Osnovy postroeniya nauchno-tekhnicheskoi terminologii [Fundamentals of building scientific and technical terminology]. M., Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR. (In Russ).

9. Robustova V.V. 2022. Interpretiruyushchii potentsial onomasticheskoi kategorizatsii [Interpretive potential of onomastic categorization] // Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. T. 51. no. 4, pp. 345–350. (In Russ).

10. Robustova V.V., Manchenkova A.I. 2021. Reprezentiruyushchaya funktsiya imen sobstvennykh [Representative function of proper names] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 19. Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya. no. 1, pp. 32–41. (In Russ.)

11. Svyatoslavskii A.V. 2011.Sreda obitaniya kak sreda pamyati: k istorii otechestvennoi memorial’noi kul’tury [Habitat as a memory environment: to the history of Russian memorial culture]: Avtoref… diss. d-ra kul’turologii: 24.00.01. M., MPGU. (In Russ.)

12. Slivchikova Yu.V. 2014. Vestimentarnye terminy-eponimy v sovremennom ispanskom yazyke [Vestimentary eponyms in modern Spanish] // Vestnik MGIMO. no. 1 (34), pp. 290–295. (In Russ).

13. Chikil’din D.V. 2016. Vazhnost’ eponimii v meditsinskom diskurse [Importance of eponyms in the medical discourse] // European research. no. 3 (14), pp. 41–44. (In Russ).

14. Ayesu K., Nguyen B., Harris S., Carlan S. 2018. The case for consistent use of medical eponyms by eliminating possessive forms // Journal of the Medical Library Association, no. 106 (1), pp. 127–129.

15. Cole T.R.P., Hughes H.E. 1994. Sotos syndrome: a study of the diagnostic criteria and natural history // Journal of Medical Genetics, pp. 20–32.

16. Strous R.D., Edelman M.C. 2007. Eponyms and the Nazi era: time to remember and time for change // Israel Medical Association Journal, no. 9, pp. 207–214.