Ib in Middle School (Ib Myp): A Case Study of Teachers’ Needs

Abstract

This article presents the results of an empirical study of learners’ needs analysis to design a potential training course to adapt teachers to work in a middle school with International Baccalaureate (IB MYP) programs. The purpose of the study was to identify learning needs as well as gaps and expectations, preferred formats, amount of time that teachers in Russian schools have available for professional development courses in IB MYP programs. Using a survey method, the study identifies learning preferences of teachers as participants in a potential course: practice orientation, attention to documentation, preferred topics and formats of work. The learning needs analysis also revealed barriers that may prevent teachers from effectively engaging in professional development, including lack of time, conceptual complexity of the material, lack of institutional support and lack of professional guidance. The Learning Needs Analysis has proven to be a convenient, relatively simple, flexible, and effective tool for subsequent course design. The authors conclude that it is versatile for courses of varying focus and duration and suggest a number of ways to make the method more useful for understanding the learning context of specific groups by adding sociometric questions.

References

1. Vygotskii L.S. 2012 Myshlenie i rech [Thinking and Speech]. Мoscow, Labirint. (In Russ.)

2. Gureeva A.V. 1983. Kriticheskii analiz pragmaticheskoi estetiki D. Dewey [A Critical Analysis of Pragmatic Aesthetics of D. Dewey]. Мoscow, Moscow state university publishing. (In Russ.)

3. Kolesnikova А.N., Maslova A.A. 2019. Through the eyes of High School students: which English pronunciation norm to study in Russia? Vestnik Moscovskogo universiteta, no 2, pp. 115–123.

4. Lavrenteva I.V., Tsveliukh I.P. 2018. Predpochitaemye pedagogami formaty povysheniia kvalifikatsii [Preferred formats of professional development by teachers]. Kontsept, no.7, pp. 462–477. (In Russ.)

5. Maslova A.A., Kolesnikova А.N. 2020. Trebovaniya k proiznosheniyu prepodavatelya anglijskogo yazyka: normativnost’ ili foneticheskaya razborchivost’? [Pronunciation standards for the teacher of English: Near-Nativeness or Intelligibility?]. Vestnik Moscovskogo universiteta, no 4, pp. 171–182. (In Russ.)

6. Piaget J. 1969. Izbrannye psikhologicheskie Trudy [Selected Psychological Works]. Мoscow, Prosveshchenie. (In Russ.)

7. Solovova E.N. 2005. Metodika obucheniia inostrannym iazykam Bazovyi kurs lektsii posobie dlia studentov ped vuzov i uchitelei [Methods of Teaching Foreign Languages. Basic Course of Lectures: A Manual for Students of Pedagogical Universities and Teachers]. Мoscow. (In Russ.)

8. Titova S.V., Barinova K.V. 2021. Sposobi predostavleniya obratnoy svyazi i organizatsii refleksii v online-obuchenii inostrannim yazikam [Feedback and Reflection in Foreign Language Teaching]. Vestnik Moscovskogo universiteta, no 2, pp. 191–203. (In Russ.)

9. Shchedrovitskii P.G. 1993. Ocherki po filosofii obrazovaniia [Essays on the Philosophy of Education]. Мoscow, pp. 57–58. (In Russ.)

10. Iachmenev V.D., Kvashnin E.G. 2018. Proektirovanie traektorii professionalnogo rosta pedagoga v protsesse nepreryvnogo professionalnogo razvitiia [Designing the trajectory of professional growth of the teacher in the process of continuous professional development]. Nauchnoe obespechenie sistemy povysheniia kvalifikatsii kadrov, no. 3 (36), pp. 22–30. (In Russ.)

11. Baran E., AlZoubi D. 2020. Affordances, challenges, and impact of open pedagogy: Examining students’ voices. Distance Education, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 230–244.

12. Cohen L., Manion L., Morriso K. 2018. Research methods in education. London, England.

13. Dagnino F.M., Dimitriadis Y.A., Pozzi F. et al. 2018. Exploring teachers’ needs and the existing barriers to the adoption of Learning Design methods and tools: A literature survey. British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 998–1013.

14. Diep A. N., Zhu, C., Cocquyt, C., De Greef, M., Vo, M. H., Vanwing, T. 2019. Adult learners’ needs in online and blended learning. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 223–253.

15. Kaskani A., Zafiri M.-N., Dimogeronta P. 2021. A Needs Analysis Questionnaire: Designing and Evaluation. Journal of English Literature and Language, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–9.

16. Nunan D. 1998. Syllabus design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

17. Richards J.C. 2001. Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

18. West R. 1994. Needs analysis in language teaching. Language teaching, vol. 27, no. 1.