eLIBRARY ID: 8377
ISSN: 2074-1588

eLIBRARY ID: 8377
ISSN: 2074-1588

En Ru
Spatial archetypes in the artistic world of V.E. Savkin and Yu.D. Deev.

Spatial archetypes in the artistic world of V.E. Savkin and Yu.D. Deev.

Recieved: 09/05/2022

Accepted: 10/12/2022

Published: 03/30/2023

Keywords: City of Kitezh; archetype; naive art.

DOI Number: 10.55959/MSU-2074-1588-19-26-1-12

Available online: 30.03.2023

To cite this article

Mokletsova I.V., Kashkova A. I. Spatial archetypes in the artistic world of V.E. Savkin and Yu.D. Deev. . // Moscow University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication 2023. Issue 1. 138–148 https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU-2074-1588-19-26-1-12.

Issue 1, 2023

Abstract

The language of naive painting, like verbal, is a universal communicative system, which gives reason to use a diachronic approach to explore its content arising from the depths of human nature. Being a combination of historical experience and psychological energy, the archetype becomes a symbolic unit of the analysis of naive paintings. The universality of the archetype is manifested in its ability to be realized in different time contexts, which makes it a very attractive subject of research in the works of naive artists of the second half of the XX century. Repeated reference to the archetype of the “ideal city” accelerates its adaptation to new cultural realities, becoming a method of interaction of a self-taught artist with the world. The relevance of the research is related to the interest in the implementation of the utopian project of the city within the framework of modern art space. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that for the first time the archetype of the ideal city will be considered in the works of naive painting by artists V.E. Sakiyan and Yu.D. Deev. The research is aimed at studying the diachronic aspect of the creative interpretation of the «ideal city» archetype in the images of Russian artistic culture.

References

1. Berdyaev N.A. 1989. Filosofiya svobody [Philosophy of freedom]. The meaning of creativity. Moscow, Pravda. (In Russ.)

2. Bohemian K.G. 2009. Naivnye hudozhniki Rossii [Naive artists of Russia]. St. Petersburg, Aleteya. (In Russ.)

3. Girenok F.I. 2001. Arheografiya naivnosti [Archeography of naivety]. Filosofiya naivnosti. Moscow, pp. 23–29. (In Russ.)

4. Durkheim E. 1991. O razdelenii obshchestvennogo truda. Metod sociologii [On the division of social labor. The method of sociology]. Moscow, Nauka. (In Russ.)

5. Zhigunova G.V. 2014. Obshchestvennyj ideal v Rossii v duhovnom nasledii slavyanofilov [The social ideal in Russia in the spiritual heritage of the Slavophiles]. Moscow, Direct-Media. (In Russ.)

6. Kalutskov V.N. 2009. Voprosy reprezentacii kul’turnogo landshafta [Issues of representation of the cultural landscape]. Vestnik moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 5. Geografiya, no. 5. URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/voprosy-reprezentatsii-kulturnogo-landshafta/viewer (accessed: 10.27.2022). (In Russ.)

7. Kirichenko E.I. 2016. Sociokul’turnye osnovaniya i regional’noe svoeobrazie narodnoj kartiny i naivnoj zhivopisi v sovremennom kul’turnom prostranstve [Socio-cultural foundations and regional originality of folk painting and naive painting in the modern cultural space]. Amplituda kolebanij. Naiv i ar bryut: ot klassiki k sovremennosti. Moscow, pp. 144–155. (In Russ.)

8. Koshman L.V. 2011. Kul’turnoe nasledie kak faktor istoricheskoj pamyati [Cultural heritage as a factor of historical memory]. Vestnik moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 8. Istoriya, no. 5. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kulturnoe-nasledie-kak-faktor-istoricheskoy-pamyati/viewer (accessed: 27.10.2022). (In Russ.)

9. Leskov A.N. 1956. ZHizn’ Nikolaya Leskova: Po ego lichnym, semejnym i nesemejnym zapisyam i pamyatyam [The life of Nikolai Leskov: According to his personal, family and non-family records and memories]. Moscow, Goslitizdat. (In Russ.)

10. Lossky N.O. 1957. Harakter russkogo naroda [The character of the Russian people]. Moscow, Sowing. (In Russ.)

11. Lotman M.Y. 1994. Besedy o russkoj kul’ture. Byt i tradicii russkogo dvoryanstva (XVIII-nachalo XIX veka) [Conversations about Russian culture. The life and traditions of the Russian nobility (XVIII — early XIX century)]. Saint Petersburg, Art — SPB. (In Russ.)

12. Mircea E. 2020. Aspekty mifa [Aspects of myth]. Moscow, Academic project. (In Russ.)

13. Romanov K.S. 2008. Syuzhet “O grade Kitezhe” v fol’klore narodov mira (na primere russkoj, amerikanskoj aborigennoj i francuzskoj tradicii) [The plot “About the city of Kitezh” in the folklore of the peoples of the world (on the example of Russian, American aboriginal and French traditions)]. Moscow State University Bulletin Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 1. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/syuzhet-o-grade-kitezhe-v-folklore-narodov-mira-na-primere-russkoy-amerikanskoy-aborigennoy-i-frantsuzskoy-traditsii (accessed: 01.06.2022). (In Russ.)

14. Skorokhodova S.I. 2018. “Ocharovanie Kitezhem” ili o nekotoryh filosofsko-istoricheskih ideyah I.V. Kireevskogo i E.N. Trubeckogo [“Fascination with Kitezh” or about some philosophical and historical ideas of I.V. Kireevsky and E.N. Trubetskoy]. Filosofiya i kul’tura. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ocharovanie-kitezhem-ili-o-nekotoryh-filosofsko-istoricheskih-ideyah-i-v-kireevskogo-i-e-n-trubetskogo (accessed: 04.07.2022). (In Russ.)